Bioinformatics.Org
Professional Membership

Your donations keep us online!
I pledge to donate (USD)...

 $


Not logged in
  • Log in
  • The Organization
  • About us
  • Membership (29291+)
  • Hosted groups (460)
  • Bioinformatics courses
  • Core Facility
  • Career Center
  • Wiki New!
  • Franklin Award
  • Sponsorship
  • Contribute
  • Research
    Online databases
  • EST clusters
  • Immigrant genes
  • Leukemia genes
  • p53 tumor protein gene
  • Pancreatic cancer genes
  • Staph. aureus microarrays
  • TB drug targets
  • Acronyms

  • Online analysis tools
  • COMBOSA3D: Molecule coloring
  • JaMBW: Mol. Biol. workbench
  • PeCoP: Conserved positions
  • PrimerX: Mutagenic primers
  • Savvy: Plasmid map drawing
  • SeWeR: Sequence analysis
  • Sequence Extractor
  • SMS 2: Sequence manipulation

  • Links to Linux software
    All information groups

    Development
    Group hosting [?]
  • All software projects
  • FTP repository
  • SVN repository [?]
  • CVS repository [?]
  • Mailing lists
  • Education
    New! Bioinformatics courses
    Bioinformatics FAQ

    Store
    Bioinformatics bookstore

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Bulletin Board
  • Mailing list
  • Archives

  • Bioclusters
  • Mailing list
  • Archives

  • Biodevelopers
  • Mailing list
  • Archives

  • Molecular visualization
  • Mailing list
  • Archives
  • Other resources

    BioMail

    BioBanner

    News & Commentary

    Nature: Openness makes software better sooner
    Submitted by Gary Van Domselaar; posted on Saturday, July 19, 2003 (4 comments)
    Submitter An article by Philip Ball:

    ``Computer software develops more effectively when its code is freely accessible to all, UK researchers have calculated.

    ``This will come as no surprise to the legions of supporters of open-access software, such as the operating systems and tools the Linux and Apache projects distribute. To them, the superiority of freely available code is an article of faith - as much an ideological position as a technological decision.

    ``The theoretical model of software debugging devised by Damien Challet and Yann Le Du of the University of Oxford has some sobering messages for companies who prefer to keep their software proprietary. 'Closed-source' software, finessed by staff hired to work on information that users send in, requires higher-quality programmers and more users to attain the same level of perfection as open-source software in a comparable time.

    ``In other words, for a given set of users finding and reporting bugs, and programmers correcting them, open-source software will always be debugged faster than closed-source software, the researchers reckon."

    Full article:
    [link]

    Challet, D. & Du, Y. L. Closed source versus open source in a model of software bug dynamics:
    http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0306511

    Discussion forums: Nature: Openness makes software better sooner

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place | Post | Admin

    No messages in "Nature: Openness makes software better sooner".

    Start a new thread:

    You have to be logged in to post a reply.

     

    Acknowledgments

    We wish to thank the following for their support:

    [MGRC]

    [Become a sponsor]