Bioinformatics.org
[NEU MS in Bioinformatics]
Not logged in

Bioinformatics.org
Membership (37265+) Group hosting [?]

Careers
About bioinformatics
Bioinformatics training
Bioinformatics jobs

Research
All information groups
Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

Development
All software groups
FTP repository
SVN & CVS repositories [?]
Mailing lists

Forums
News & Commentary
Jobs Forum
(Career Center)

News & Commentary - Message forums

The Economist: Publish and be wrong
Submitted by Mark Luo; posted on Monday, October 20, 2008
Submitter An article from The Economist print edition:

``Dr Ioannidis made a splash three years ago by arguing, quite convincingly, that most published scientific research is wrong. Now, along with Neal Young of the National Institutes of Health in Maryland and Omar Al-Ubaydli, an economist at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, he suggests why.

``It starts with the nuts and bolts of scientific publishing. Hundreds of thousands of scientific researchers are hired, promoted and funded according not only to how much work they produce, but also to where it gets published. For many, the ultimate accolade is to appear in a journal like Nature or Science. Such publications boast that they are very selective, turning down the vast majority of papers that are submitted to them.

``The assumption is that, as a result, such journals publish only the best scientific work. But Dr Ioannidis and his colleagues argue that the reputations of the journals are pumped up by an artificial scarcity of the kind that keeps diamonds expensive. And such a scarcity, they suggest, can make it more likely that the leading journals will publish dramatic, but what may ultimately turn out to be incorrect, research.''

SOURCE:
[link]

Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

Start a new thread:
You have to be logged in to post a reply.

 

Copyright © 2016 · Scilico, LLC