Bioinformatics.org
[University of Birmingham]
[Patsnap]
Not logged in
  • Log in
  • Bioinformatics.org
    Membership (44421+) Group hosting [?] Wiki
    Franklin Award
    Sponsorships

    Careers
    About bioinformatics
    Bioinformatics jobs

    Research
    All information groups
    Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

    Development
    All software groups
    FTP repository
    SVN & CVS repositories [?]
    Mailing lists

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • News & Commentary - Message forums

    News.com: Itanium allies fund open-source [GCC] compiler work
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 (2 comments)

    Submitter

    A short article by Stephen Shankland:

    ``In the newest of a series of moves to try to impart momentum to Intel's Itanium processor, allies backing the chip are funding work to improve a key programming tool.

    ``Some of the $10 billion in five years that members of the Itanium Solutions Alliance are spending on Itanium market and technology development will go to Itanium-specific improvements to the GCC, or GNU Compiler Collection. The Gelato Federation, an organization dedicated to boosting Linux on Itanium computers, is overseeing the work, the allies said this week at the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco.''

    Full story:
    http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-6048677.html

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

    Message
    Re: Too Bad
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Monday, March 20, 2006
    Submitter Anyone at that point would have been stunned to learn how few systems actually ended up using Itanium. Rumors of the day were that SPARC, PPC, MIPS, etc. would all be abandoned for the superior "Merced" chip to come. What a difference 5 years make.



    Post a followup to this message:
    You have to be logged in to post a reply.
    Thread view
    Too Bad
    Submitted by Mike Coleman; posted on Tuesday, March 14, 2006
    Too bad they didn't do this 5+ years ago, when it might have made a difference.
    Re: Too Bad
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Monday, March 20, 2006
    Submitter Anyone at that point would have been stunned to learn how few systems actually ended up using Itanium. Rumors of the day were that SPARC, PPC, MIPS, etc. would all be abandoned for the superior "Merced" chip to come. What a difference 5 years make.

     

    Copyright © 2024 Scilico, LLC · Privacy Policy