Bioinformatics.org
[NEU MS in Bioinformatics]
Not logged in
  • Log in
  • Bioinformatics.org
    Membership (37984+) Group hosting [?]
  • Wiki
  • Franklin Award
  • Sponsorships
  • Careers
    About bioinformatics
    Bioinformatics training
    Bioinformatics jobs

    Research
    All information groups
    Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

    Development
    All software groups
    FTP repository
    SVN & CVS repositories [?]
    Mailing lists

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • News & Commentary - Message forums

    The Economist: Think of a Number, then Double It
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Saturday, July 14, 2001 (1 comment)

    Submitter

    ``When the papers containing the first attempts to sequence the human genome were published earlier this year, some people purported to be shocked. The cause of their shock was the number (or, rather, the lack of number) of genes that it took to carry the blueprint for a human being. One paper, published by the publicly funded Human Genome Consortium (prop. Francis Collins, of America's National Institutes of Health), came up with a figure of 31,000. The other, the product of Celera, a private company (prop. Craig Venter), suggested around 26,000.

    ``Within the margins of error expected of such cutting-edge research, that sounded like a consensus. The reason that many people were sceptical was that it was little larger than the figures previously arrived at for nematode worms (19,000) and fruitflies (13,600). Surely, these scientists argued, people are a lot more complex than worms and flies. And that should mean that they must have many more genes.

    ``A paper just published in Genome Biology suggests that the sceptics might be right, after all. Bo Yuan, of Ohio State University, in Columbus, and his colleagues, suspect that the human genome contains not 30,000 genes, but more than twice that figure. Their estimate, arrived at using a different approach from that employed by Celera and the Human Genome Consortium, is 65,000-75,000.''

    Full story:
    www.economist.com/prin[...]91244

    Reference by Slashdot.org.

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

    Message
    Double them all?
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Saturday, July 14, 2001
    Submitter If assembled EST's show that the number of human genes is some 60,000, double of what was estimated by other methods, then they may show that the other organisms also have double the number of genes. Perhaps nematodes have 40,000, and fruit flies have 25,000? Then, humans are STILL only "a little more complex than worms and flies"! :-)



    Post a followup to this message:
    You have to be logged in to post a reply.
    Thread view
    Double them all?
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Saturday, July 14, 2001
    Submitter If assembled EST's show that the number of human genes is some 60,000, double of what was estimated by other methods, then they may show that the other organisms also have double the number of genes. Perhaps nematodes have 40,000, and fruit flies have 25,000? Then, humans are STILL only "a little more complex than worms and flies"! :-)

     

    Copyright © 2016 · Scilico, LLC