Bioinformatics.org
[Regeneron]
[Repositive.io]
[OMICtools]
Not logged in
  • Log in
  • Bioinformatics.org
    Membership (39409+) Group hosting [?] Wiki
    Franklin Award
    Sponsorships

    Careers
    About bioinformatics
    Bioinformatics training
    Bioinformatics jobs

    Research
    All information groups
    Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

    Development
    All software groups
    FTP repository
    SVN & CVS repositories [?]
    Mailing lists

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • Ghemical: Molecular modelling - Message forums

    Discussion forums: Open Discussion

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

    Message
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Nobody; posted on Saturday, August 25, 2001
    Hi there, I'm having troubles building ghemical with the gcc 3.0.1 (I could be more verbose on the type of error, but I would just like to make sure that someone _has_ been building ghemical whit this version of gcc. Thanks in advance and sorry to post anonymously -- jose (venceslau@mailandnews.com)



    Post a followup to this message:
    You have to be logged in to post a reply.
    Thread view
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Nobody; posted on Saturday, August 25, 2001
    Hi there, I'm having troubles building ghemical with the gcc 3.0.1 (I could be more verbose on the type of error, but I would just like to make sure that someone _has_ been building ghemical whit this version of gcc. Thanks in advance and sorry to post anonymously -- jose (venceslau@mailandnews.com)
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Tommi Hassinen; posted on Sunday, August 26, 2001
    Hi, I tried it some time ago with gcc-3.0.0, and there were some problems. I don't remember if it finally worked or not, but at least I added those using namespace std; lines here and there, so please at least use the CVS version if you try gcc-3. gcc-2.96.2 has worked for me so far... TH
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Jose Venceslau; posted on Sunday, August 26, 2001
    I've gotten the cvs, but the problem remains, in parsmart.cpp in oelib. I've commented the ofending function (yes, I will get back to it to figure what is wrong with it, but my years of cpp are long gone :-) and I'm proceding in the compilation just to check what other tools/libs are needed. I've fetched the fortran to c header files (f2c.h needed in src/common), but now I'm having problems in src/graphics now. So, it has been a bumpy but nice ride :-)
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Nobody; posted on Monday, August 27, 2001
    Yes, you definitely need f2c libs and headers now because the MOPAC7 stuff is included. Today I was able to compile the CVS version with the RedHat 7.1 compiler (one of those "doped" 2.96 compilers). So why hurry to gcc-3 anyway? :-) TH (anon because I just forgot to login)
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Jose Venceslau; posted on Monday, August 27, 2001
    ghemical build with(sort off ;-) weel, after some tweaking (changing -mpentium to -march=pentium in makefiles, removing -I/usr/include from makefiles because it drives gcc #next_include mad and some other incantations that I cant no longer remember, I've built ghemical and it even runs) Well, not for long, cause it takes just a bit of fussing for it to dump core :-) I had to comment a funtion in oelib/parsmart.cpp in order to compile and it must be driving the rest of the code nuts :-) [yes, I know that it's not The Right Way to compile and I do understand the impications of such a stupid fix :-)] I had gcc 2.9.1.something on my system and some app told me it needed gcc > 2.9.5, so I just tought, what the weck, lets go for the bledding edge - ouch, it's hurting :^) So, I'm im reading on STL,doing some mumbo jumbo to parsmart.cpp whenever I've a free time. (no, I will not ask a friend to build it for me nor will I downgrade my super-sharp ginksu gcc :-)
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Tommi Hassinen; posted on Tuesday, August 28, 2001
    Ok. :-) We will try gcc-3 more seriously after it has become a bit more mainstream than today (read: debian and/or redhat uses it). BTW, at the moment file import/export and "add hydrogens" use OELib code; so if there are problems also with other features than these you have hit with an another problem... TH
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Nobody; posted on Tuesday, October 16, 2001
    > We will try gcc-3 more seriously after it has become a bit more mainstream than today (read: debian and/or redhat uses it). FYI: Debian uses gcc-3 already on ia-64 at least.
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Geoff Hutchison; posted on Tuesday, November 13, 2001
    Submitter The catch is that while the Ghemical code seems to be fine with gcc3, the OELib code for file import/export and other functions is not. I'm working with the OELib developers to get a new version of OELib, hopefully "Real Soon Now." -Geoff
    building ghemical with gcc 3.0.1 ?
    Submitted by Nobody; posted on Tuesday, November 20, 2001
    Good to know. I asked the oelib developer about it and he told me he was doing a closed source rewrite of it, pointing out that open-oelib won't be developped much in the future. Do you know anything about this? Michael

     

    [G6GFindr]
    Copyright © 2017 · Scilico, LLC