[BiO BB] Need installation of Bio software on Mac
cortig at free.fr
Wed Jun 15 19:38:49 EDT 2005
À 10:14 +0200 le 06/15/05, Dr. Christoph Gille a écrit:
>many thanks for taking the time to try this out.
Not a problem.
>I generally append the suffix dot exe to binaries because this allows me
>to have the same documentation for DOS and UNIX.
>A symbolic link (ln -s ...) of the clustalW or dialign-t binarie to the
>specified directory is only recognized when it gets the ending dot exe.
>Most binaries like clustalW come in an JAR archive because some require
>more than one file. Even though the clustalW version is the ordinary
>C-version and not a java-version.
Very true too (though you can have a system to
detect the platform and adapt the symlinks
accordingly, but I get your point).
I still believe it could be worth querying the
system to check whether the apps are not already
installed somewhere else (eg: /usr/local/bin),
but I realize it represents more work for you.
>I am a bit disappointed that the installation of dialign-t fails on Mac.
>Theroetically, STRAP should go to the directory
>Subsequently the command make
>should be executed
>finally the binary should be renamed
>mv dialign-t dialign-t.exe
>Do you know which of these steps failed ?
The console reports:
>2005-06-15 18:19:02.536 java tabletProximity:
>FocusManager noResponderFor called
>2005-06-15 18:19:18.955 java tabletProximity:
>Jun 15 18:19:31 Corentin java: tabletProximity:
>Jun 15 18:21:26 Corentin java: tabletProximity:
The .jar file was properly downloaded and the
dialign-t folder contains all the source files.
I (very briefly) saw a warning that mentioned
make (but it was too fast nor me to actually read
If I move to this directory and run make I get:
>gcc -O3 -march=i686 -funroll-loops -c -o museq.o museq.c
>cc1: error: invalid option 'arch=i686'
>make: *** [museq.o] Error 1
If I rename Makefile.MAC_OS into Makefile and run
make, I get the binary. I can then rename it and
use it in the app.
I used it on the example sequences and all I got
was "no score availabel" (with the same typo).
Since I know almost nothing about dialign-t, that
might as well have been expected.
>Supposed it would work, how do you like the concept of distributing the
>source rather than executables ?
It's a tough choice.
Binaries are convenient and allow deployment
regardless of the fact that people have installed
Distributing the sources instead would require
that people have installed X-Code on their Mac
(which should be the case for most people running
command-line applications for bioinformatics
I tend to like the sources better...
Don't hesitate to ping me off-list if you need
additional information and don;t want to bother
the rest of the list.
More information about the BBB