From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Mon Oct 1 09:14:49 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:14:49 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> Hi, Many thanks for trying the script and for all the feedback. > Since you said "should also be fine if run on a vanilla Ubuntu 12.04 > box (or even on regular Ubuntu 10.04)" I decided to give a try for the > new version of Ubuntu Studio 12.04 64 bits that comes with Xfce and > all the cool stuff for Audio ,Graphics ,Video , Photography and > Publishing already installed. > > So far no regrets, the panels and menus are looking very similar with > the old gnome 2 style, very nice look and feel and I loved the very > minimalistic button on the top left that give you access to everything > you need inside a single menu. (Also with the bioinformatics submenu) > Of course you can always install Unity if you think this will improve > your productivity. (not my case) :P > Good to know that everything installs onto Ubuntu Studio and the menus look OK. I've not used this distro myself but from a quick look it seems to be in the same area as Linux Mint but without the nasty green interface, which can't be bad. > Before trying this I upgraded my old version of Biolinux 6 and this > gave me the feeeling that I just got a brand new Ubuntu 12.04/Unity > without anything special or specific for Bioinformatics. > I know the packages were installled but the feeling was not the same. > (I hope/imagine you guys will make a good artwork before the official > release to make it looks more like Biolinux, am I right ?) Yes, the custom wallpaper is literally the only branding on there now, but I intend to add some more and to try and make the bioinformatics tools more prominent as discussed before. > Another thing I would like to suggest is a categorization of all the > apps installed related with Bioinformatics. Ubuntu Studio once again, > did a really good job splitting into Audio, Photography, Graphics and > Video. Would be nice to have something like that for Biolinux, ex: > DNA, RNA, Protein, NGS ... and so on ... just a suggestion. We already have some of that info buried in the documentation pages, so I've been considering how best to expose that within Unity. Maybe by adding it to the appropriate .desktop files or by adding a custom lens, which may be easier than I first thought using Singlet (http://mhall119.com/2012/01/simplified-unity-lens-development-with-singlet/). > One of the things would be really nice to have in Biolinux is a meta > package Same way Ubuntu Studio has, so everyone could convert his > Ubuntu based distro in Biolinux. > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Ubuntu%20Studio%20Upgrade%20from% > 20Ubuntu Indeed, and I could convert the update script (or at least a portion of it) into a package with a big set of dependencies. But at this stage it's easier just to have a script. My priority is to give existing Bio-Linux users a one-shot upgrade, but the fact that this also works on Vanilla Ubuntu/Ubuntu Studio is a bonus. Cheers, TIM > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Tim Booth wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I'm looking into how best to customise the default panel on > the Unity > Dash. The things that come up when you click the Ubuntu logo > at the top > (AKA the BFB - big freakin button) are called 'lenses' - the > Home lens, > the Applications lens, the Files lens etc. I looked at what it > would > take to make my own bioinformatics lens - there are full > instructions - > and it might be worth a shot but then it might take weeks to > perfect and > I'd like a quicker solution. > > The Home lens with the smart search is pretty neat, but some > of the > others aren't even very good for Ubuntu, never mind > Bio-Linux. How the > heck is it generating "Apps available for Download" in the > Applications > lens? It seems to pick some totally random packages, then, if > you click > one, next time you look it generates another random > selection. How > pointless! > > I agree that having a folder of app links and putting Galaxy > in the side > bar is probably the quickest way to get something acceptable, > though > it's not ideal. > > > Cheers, > > TIM > > > Do you plan to change around the unity hotlinks for the > final distro? > > I imagine a folder of links to bioinformatics programs would > be useful > > to new users, and unity is a bit annoying in the > > no hierarchical menus. Maybe as Galaxy is the flagship, pin > that to > > the main menu, and drop ubuntuone etc > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > On 27 September 2012 12:03, Tim Booth > wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:51 +0100, Daniel Pass > wrote: > > > Currently I have only gone the route of > Ubuntu12.04 into BL7 > > on my > > > laptop, but that seemed to work flawlessly > although did need > > a couple > > > of re-runs. Qiime continues to work as before. > > > > > > > So you can confirm you now have Qiime 1.5, right? > > > > > > Im running it on my virtual box now but keeping > expectations > > low after > > > you said there were issues with it before, Tim. It > won't let > > me run > > > the script straight, and keeps forcing the > 'upgrade to > > 12.04' gui on > > > me so letting it do that first so assuming it'll > go after > > that. > > > > > > > The script can't do its work until the base system > is updated > > to Ubuntu > > 12.04. This brings with it things like the kernel, > Gnome, > > python, etc. > > This bit of the update is handled by the Ubuntu > upgrade GUI. > > > > If you think you are already upgraded to 12.04 but > you still > > get this > > situation then let me know. > > > > Cheers, > > > > TIM > > > > > > > -- > > Tim Booth > > NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre > > > > Centre for Ecology and Hydrology > > Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane > > Crowmarsh Gifford > > Wallingford, England > > OX10 8BB > > > > http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk > > +44 1491 69 2705 > > -- > > This message (and any attachments) is for the > recipient only. > > NERC > > is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 > and the > > contents > > of this email and any reply you make may be > disclosed by NERC > > unless > > it is exempt from release under the Act. Any > material supplied > > to > > NERC may be stored in an electronic records > management system. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > > > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Daniel Pass > > > > Tel: (029208)76680 > > Mob: 07735658687 > > http://www.kille-morgan.org.uk > > > > Room 0.39, > > School of Biosciences, > > Biological Sciences Building, > > Museum Avenue, > > Cardiff, > > CF10 3AT > > > > > > > > -- > Tim Booth > NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre > > Centre for Ecology and Hydrology > Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane > Crowmarsh Gifford > Wallingford, England > OX10 8BB > > http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk > +44 1491 69 2705 > _______________________________________________ > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev > > -- Tim Booth NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford, England OX10 8BB http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk +44 1491 69 2705 From gawbul at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 16:35:56 2012 From: gawbul at gmail.com (Steve Moss) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 21:35:56 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) Message-ID: Dear Tim, I've just run through the upgrade process on an existing Ubuntu 12.04 release (on my laptop at home) and have had no problems at all. Everything installed smoothly! Excellent script, thanks! Will upgrade our bioinformatics lab PCs when I'm next in and let you know how that goes :) Cheers, Steve -- Kindest regards, Steve Moss http://about.me/gawbul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Fri Oct 5 11:40:05 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:40:05 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Something for the weekend - new Plymouth boot logo Message-ID: <1349451605.3001.5.camel@balisaur> Hi, Still no bootable ISO for Bio-Linux 7 just yet, but if anyone on this list has upgraded to BL7 and is irked to still see the Bio-Linux 6 logo (or the Ubuntu logo depending on your setup) during boot-up then this is for you: apt-get install bio-linux-plymouth-theme Note - if you didn't see a boot logo with progress dots under it at all before then don't expect to see one now (Plymouth doesn't work on all graphics cards and I'm not the man to fix it - you're stuck with the blank screen). If you have other problems with the package - eg. still seeing the old logo - then do let me know. Cheers, TIM -- Tim Booth NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford, England OX10 8BB http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk +44 1491 69 2705 -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. From mikeyj.cox at gmail.com Thu Oct 11 04:29:22 2012 From: mikeyj.cox at gmail.com (Mike Cox) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:29:22 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: Hi Tim, Have just bitten the bullet and run the script on our BL6 box. One or two hiccups: 1. When I initially ran the script I hit a question about whether or not to update a Grub config file. There were about 7 or 8 different choices here, so I went conservative and chose to keep the version I have. In hindsight should I have selected differently? If so, how can I change this now? 2. After the first run through of the script I had a fully operative Precise, but very little of BioLinux. Repeat running of the script installed some additional things, but got to a point where there were still bits missing (QIIME hadn't updated fully - though it would run the QIIME shell no commands would work as it complained about the wrong version of numpy). Running it several more times just gave the same result (T-coffee was in a loop, being marked for upgrade, but then never upgrading for example). I fixed this by updating via synaptic, which leaves me with a working QIIME. I don't have the BioLinux background, so I suspect that I still have a partial install. Is there a way to compare what should be installed and what I actually have? NX also not yet working (users attempting to access get a message saying 'access disabled by host'). Attempted to follow Tony's suggestions above - installed Fallback (which hadn't been installed), installed ubuntu-desktop (or so thought) and purged network-manager, breaking my internet connection. This fool suggests the update isn't quite fool-proof yet - I should be a professional caving canary ;) Also I left my keys at home, which means my laptop is locked in a drawer. I'm fairly sure you can't help with this, but a lend of a jemmy would be useful. Today is fired. Any reccommendations? Everything is backed up in case a full install is required - but we have a lot of users, so that would be a pain. Cheers Mike blog: http://palecomic.tumblr.com/ skype: mikeyjcox twitter: mikeyj On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Tim Booth wrote: > Hi, > > Many thanks for trying the script and for all the feedback. > > > Since you said "should also be fine if run on a vanilla Ubuntu 12.04 > > box (or even on regular Ubuntu 10.04)" I decided to give a try for the > > new version of Ubuntu Studio 12.04 64 bits that comes with Xfce and > > all the cool stuff for Audio ,Graphics ,Video , Photography and > > Publishing already installed. > > > > So far no regrets, the panels and menus are looking very similar with > > the old gnome 2 style, very nice look and feel and I loved the very > > minimalistic button on the top left that give you access to everything > > you need inside a single menu. (Also with the bioinformatics submenu) > > > Of course you can always install Unity if you think this will improve > > your productivity. (not my case) :P > > > Good to know that everything installs onto Ubuntu Studio and the menus > look OK. I've not used this distro myself but from a quick look it > seems to be in the same area as Linux Mint but without the nasty green > interface, which can't be bad. > > > Before trying this I upgraded my old version of Biolinux 6 and this > > gave me the feeeling that I just got a brand new Ubuntu 12.04/Unity > > without anything special or specific for Bioinformatics. > > > I know the packages were installled but the feeling was not the same. > > (I hope/imagine you guys will make a good artwork before the official > > release to make it looks more like Biolinux, am I right ?) > > Yes, the custom wallpaper is literally the only branding on there now, > but I intend to add some more and to try and make the bioinformatics > tools more prominent as discussed before. > > > Another thing I would like to suggest is a categorization of all the > > apps installed related with Bioinformatics. Ubuntu Studio once again, > > did a really good job splitting into Audio, Photography, Graphics and > > Video. Would be nice to have something like that for Biolinux, ex: > > DNA, RNA, Protein, NGS ... and so on ... just a suggestion. > > We already have some of that info buried in the documentation pages, so > I've been considering how best to expose that within Unity. Maybe by > adding it to the appropriate .desktop files or by adding a custom lens, > which may be easier than I first thought using Singlet > ( > http://mhall119.com/2012/01/simplified-unity-lens-development-with-singlet/ > ). > > > One of the things would be really nice to have in Biolinux is a meta > > package Same way Ubuntu Studio has, so everyone could convert his > > Ubuntu based distro in Biolinux. > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-meta > > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Ubuntu%20Studio%20Upgrade%20from% > > 20Ubuntu > > Indeed, and I could convert the update script (or at least a portion of > it) into a package with a big set of dependencies. But at this stage > it's easier just to have a script. My priority is to give existing > Bio-Linux users a one-shot upgrade, but the fact that this also works on > Vanilla Ubuntu/Ubuntu Studio is a bonus. > > Cheers, > > TIM > > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Tim Booth wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > I'm looking into how best to customise the default panel on > > the Unity > > Dash. The things that come up when you click the Ubuntu logo > > at the top > > (AKA the BFB - big freakin button) are called 'lenses' - the > > Home lens, > > the Applications lens, the Files lens etc. I looked at what it > > would > > take to make my own bioinformatics lens - there are full > > instructions - > > and it might be worth a shot but then it might take weeks to > > perfect and > > I'd like a quicker solution. > > > > The Home lens with the smart search is pretty neat, but some > > of the > > others aren't even very good for Ubuntu, never mind > > Bio-Linux. How the > > heck is it generating "Apps available for Download" in the > > Applications > > lens? It seems to pick some totally random packages, then, if > > you click > > one, next time you look it generates another random > > selection. How > > pointless! > > > > I agree that having a folder of app links and putting Galaxy > > in the side > > bar is probably the quickest way to get something acceptable, > > though > > it's not ideal. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > TIM > > > > > Do you plan to change around the unity hotlinks for the > > final distro? > > > I imagine a folder of links to bioinformatics programs would > > be useful > > > to new users, and unity is a bit annoying in the > > > no hierarchical menus. Maybe as Galaxy is the flagship, pin > > that to > > > the main menu, and drop ubuntuone etc > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > On 27 September 2012 12:03, Tim Booth > > wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 11:51 +0100, Daniel Pass > > wrote: > > > > Currently I have only gone the route of > > Ubuntu12.04 into BL7 > > > on my > > > > laptop, but that seemed to work flawlessly > > although did need > > > a couple > > > > of re-runs. Qiime continues to work as before. > > > > > > > > > > So you can confirm you now have Qiime 1.5, right? > > > > > > > > Im running it on my virtual box now but keeping > > expectations > > > low after > > > > you said there were issues with it before, Tim. It > > won't let > > > me run > > > > the script straight, and keeps forcing the > > 'upgrade to > > > 12.04' gui on > > > > me so letting it do that first so assuming it'll > > go after > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > The script can't do its work until the base system > > is updated > > > to Ubuntu > > > 12.04. This brings with it things like the kernel, > > Gnome, > > > python, etc. > > > This bit of the update is handled by the Ubuntu > > upgrade GUI. > > > > > > If you think you are already upgraded to 12.04 but > > you still > > > get this > > > situation then let me know. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > TIM > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Tim Booth > > > NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre > > > > > > Centre for Ecology and Hydrology > > > Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane > > > Crowmarsh Gifford > > > Wallingford, England > > > OX10 8BB > > > > > > http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk > > > +44 1491 69 2705 > > > -- > > > This message (and any attachments) is for the > > recipient only. > > > NERC > > > is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 > > and the > > > contents > > > of this email and any reply you make may be > > disclosed by NERC > > > unless > > > it is exempt from release under the Act. Any > > material supplied > > > to > > > NERC may be stored in an electronic records > > management system. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > > > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > > > > > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Daniel Pass > > > > > > Tel: (029208)76680 > > > Mob: 07735658687 > > > http://www.kille-morgan.org.uk > > > > > > Room 0.39, > > > School of Biosciences, > > > Biological Sciences Building, > > > Museum Avenue, > > > Cardiff, > > > CF10 3AT > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tim Booth > > NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre > > > > Centre for Ecology and Hydrology > > Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane > > Crowmarsh Gifford > > Wallingford, England > > OX10 8BB > > > > http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk > > +44 1491 69 2705 > > _______________________________________________ > > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev > > > > > > -- > Tim Booth > NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre > > Centre for Ecology and Hydrology > Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane > Crowmarsh Gifford > Wallingford, England > OX10 8BB > > http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk > +44 1491 69 2705 > > _______________________________________________ > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tony.travis at ed.ac.uk Thu Oct 11 06:05:52 2012 From: tony.travis at ed.ac.uk (Tony Travis) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:05:52 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> On 11/10/12 09:29, Mike Cox wrote: > [...] > I don't have the BioLinux background, so I suspect that I still have a > partial install. Is there a way to compare what should be installed and > what I actually have? Hi, Mike. I've got a simple script to compare what's installed on a system relative to the distribution manifest generated from an iso image or on two Debian/Ubuntu systems. I tried posting it to this list before, but it was blocked by the automatic moderation policy. Let me know if you want a copy and I'll email it to you directly. > NX also not yet working (users attempting to access get a message saying > 'access disabled by host'). Attempted to follow Tony's suggestions > above - installed Fallback (which hadn't been installed), installed > ubuntu-desktop (or so thought) and purged network-manager, breaking my > internet connection. Was NX working before the upgrade? Our NX is broken, because much of "ubuntu-desktop" consists of recommended packages that are not installed by default. In particular, there is no logout button on the Gnome fall-back desktop and only the system font is available and it renders very badly on the NX desktop. I'm working on these problems and will post an update about what I discover. > This fool suggests the update isn't quite > fool-proof yet - I should be a professional caving canary ;) > Also I left my keys at home, which means my laptop is locked in a > drawer. I'm fairly sure you can't help with this, but a lend of a jemmy > would be useful. Today is fired. Personally, I think creating a Bio-Linux 7 terminal server would be quite useful. We're not quite there yet, but Tim's efforts have brought us within reach of that goal and *any* contribution you can make about using Bio-Linux in this way would be very useful. Bio-Linux is as much about building a community as it is about creating a Linux distribution. > Any reccommendations? Everything is backed up in case a full install is > required - but we have a lot of users, so that would be a pain. Check /var/log/auth.log to see what is happening when people try to connect via NX. Make sure nx and the users are permitted to login via SSH. Check the ~/.nx folder. If you create a temporary account for me with sudo rights I'll login and check it out for you (please contact me at my company email if you want me to do this: tony.travis at minke-informatics.co.uk). Bye, Tony. From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Thu Oct 11 06:47:50 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:47:50 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: <1349952470.2893.187.camel@balisaur> Hi Mike, > > 1. When I initially ran the script I hit a question about whether or > not to update a Grub config file. There were about 7 or 8 different > choices here, so I went conservative and chose to keep the version I > have. In hindsight should I have selected differently? If so, how > can I change this now? The thing with Grub is it either makes your computer boot up or it doesn't, so if it works it's right. I think I configured Grub to say "Bio-Linux" instead of "Ubuntu" in the menu which is pretty inconsequential - the menu doesn't even appear on non-dual-boot machines. But if you really want to go round again again I think you can just do: sudo apt-get install --reinstall grub > 2. After the first run through of the script I had a fully operative > Precise, but very little of BioLinux. That's right > Repeat running of the script installed some additional things, but got > to a point where there were still bits missing (QIIME hadn't updated > fully - though it would run the QIIME shell no commands would work as > it complained about the wrong version of numpy). Running it several > more times just gave the same result (T-coffee was in a loop, being > marked for upgrade, but then never upgrading for example). I fixed > this by updating via synaptic, which leaves me with a working QIIME. But this is unexpected. The idea is that the script gets you to do a full upgrade of all the existing stuff, then the second time round it makes sure all the bioinformatics stuff is in place. It sounds like part one didn't fully complete, and you sensibly pushed it through using Synaptic. > I don't have the BioLinux background, so I suspect that I still have a > partial install. Is there a way to compare what should be installed > and what I actually have? The script does this internally, and is designed so that running it on a fully upgraded system has essentially no effect. Would you mind running it again and sending me the full log (to me, not to the -dev list)? You can capture the output with 'tee': sudo bash bl_do_update_to7.sh | tee ~/update_log.txt You can also run just the bit that checks the package list and get it to report, so this is the direct answer to your question above. Download http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/downloads/bl7_only/bl_master_package_list.sh and run it using bash but *without* sudo. What does it say? > NX also not yet working (users attempting to access get a message > saying 'access disabled by host'). Attempted to follow Tony's > suggestions above - installed Fallback (which hadn't been installed), > installed ubuntu-desktop (or so thought) and purged network-manager, > breaking my internet connection. This fool suggests the update isn't > quite fool-proof yet - I should be a professional caving canary ;) This could be problematic if you depend heavily on NX, as Tony has reported NX is not entirely happy. If your machine just has a fixed wired connection then the loss of network manager is not a problem as you can set the network up the old fashioned way. And in fact for a server/workstation that doesn't move this is more sensible. In the most basic case you just add these lines to /etc/network.interfaces: auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp This assumes your network card is called 'eth0'. If not, use 'ifconfig -a' to list available cards. It also assumes you use DHCP. If not, see 'man interfaces' for the syntax to set the address manually. > Also I left my keys at home, which means my laptop is locked in a > drawer. I'm fairly sure you can't help with this, but a lend of a > jemmy would be useful. Today is fired. The bottom of the drawer is normally the best point of attack. Even a sturdy screwdriver might be enough on a cheaper desk. > Any reccommendations? Everything is backed up in case a full install > is required - but we have a lot of users, so that would be a pain. Fix the network as above and keep at it for now, I'd say. Do you have users who need NX access right away or do you have leeway to try tinkering with it as per Tony's suggestions? Cheers, TIM ps. Thanks for the BL citation in your recent paper. Dawn spotted it via Google scholar alerts. -- Tim Booth NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford, England OX10 8BB http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk +44 1491 69 2705 -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. From mikeyj.cox at gmail.com Thu Oct 11 08:02:48 2012 From: mikeyj.cox at gmail.com (Cox, Michael J) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:02:48 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> Thanks Tony, Thanks Tim Internet restored. Ran the update script and the package list script and will forward both to you Tim, the list of things not installed is quite long - includes galaxy, raxml and a number of r-cran packages. We can get around NX for the moment, I'll get people using putty or winSCP in the meantime, but it's really helpful for a number of the users that are used to desktop environments. After sorting the network connection, NX now working, but it seems much slower than it was and various bits of the desktop are missing, sidebar the most noticeable. Users definitely have ssh permissions as per http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux/accessing-bio-linux - interesting list of stuff after recent NX login in auth.log one of which seems to be related to a constant keychain message and the screen-saver lock, which doesn't clear with entering the user's password. No problem with citation Tim - very welcome! Will contact with files off list. Thanks again for your help Mike On 11 Oct 2012, at 11:05, Tony Travis wrote: > On 11/10/12 09:29, Mike Cox wrote: >> [...] >> I don't have the BioLinux background, so I suspect that I still have a >> partial install. Is there a way to compare what should be installed and >> what I actually have? > > Hi, Mike. > > I've got a simple script to compare what's installed on a system relative to the distribution manifest generated from an iso image or on two Debian/Ubuntu systems. I tried posting it to this list before, but it was blocked by the automatic moderation policy. Let me know if you want a copy and I'll email it to you directly. > >> NX also not yet working (users attempting to access get a message saying >> 'access disabled by host'). Attempted to follow Tony's suggestions >> above - installed Fallback (which hadn't been installed), installed >> ubuntu-desktop (or so thought) and purged network-manager, breaking my >> internet connection. > > Was NX working before the upgrade? > > Our NX is broken, because much of "ubuntu-desktop" consists of recommended packages that are not installed by default. In particular, there is no logout button on the Gnome fall-back desktop and only the system font is available and it renders very badly on the NX desktop. I'm working on these problems and will post an update about what I discover. > >> This fool suggests the update isn't quite >> fool-proof yet - I should be a professional caving canary ;) >> Also I left my keys at home, which means my laptop is locked in a >> drawer. I'm fairly sure you can't help with this, but a lend of a jemmy >> would be useful. Today is fired. > > Personally, I think creating a Bio-Linux 7 terminal server would be quite useful. We're not quite there yet, but Tim's efforts have brought us within reach of that goal and *any* contribution you can make about using Bio-Linux in this way would be very useful. Bio-Linux is as much about building a community as it is about creating a Linux distribution. > >> Any reccommendations? Everything is backed up in case a full install is >> required - but we have a lot of users, so that would be a pain. > > Check /var/log/auth.log to see what is happening when people try to connect via NX. Make sure nx and the users are permitted to login via SSH. Check the ~/.nx folder. > > If you create a temporary account for me with sudo rights I'll login and check it out for you (please contact me at my company email if you want me to do this: tony.travis at minke-informatics.co.uk). > > Bye, > > Tony. > _______________________________________________ > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Thu Oct 11 09:31:36 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:31:36 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> Hi Mike > > Internet restored. Ran the update script and the package list script > and will forward both to you Tim, the list of things not installed is > quite long - includes galaxy, raxml and a number of r-cran packages. OK, something has definitely jammed then. Hopefully the log will reveal the problem (looking at it now). This also explains why NX didn't work at all, as the upgrade also does some things to try and fix this. > > We can get around NX for the moment, I'll get people using putty or > winSCP in the meantime, but it's really helpful for a number of the > users that are used to desktop environments. After sorting the > network connection, NX now working, but it seems much slower than it > was and various bits of the desktop are missing, sidebar the most > noticeable. The Unity desktop really depends on using the 3D capabilities of your graphics card and so is really not suitable for NX or remote X in general, hence you have to use the Gnome fallback as suggested by Tony, or else move to something like Xfce. [ I'm not sure how hard/problematic this could be - not tried it on Ubuntu ]. One thing to bear in mind - and this is useful even if NX desktop is working perfectly - if that if a user can cope with the command line, they can set the NX Desktop option to "Custom", click "Settings", set Options to "Floating Window" and set Application to "gnome-terminal". Then instead of a full desktop, a terminal window will appear. If you run a graphical application from that terminal then that will likewise appear. This is faster than a full desktop. > > Users definitely have ssh permissions as > per http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux/accessing-bio-linux - > interesting list of stuff after recent NX login in auth.log one of > which seems to be related to a constant keychain message and the > screen-saver lock, which doesn't clear with entering the user's > password. > Not sure what to make of this. You mean you have the screensaver running in the NX desktop window? I'd just disable it. More to follow off-list. Cheers, TIM -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. From mikeyj.cox at gmail.com Thu Oct 11 10:02:44 2012 From: mikeyj.cox at gmail.com (Cox, Michael J) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:02:44 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: <1E511FDC-EFD5-4C38-9BC8-7718D0924038@gmail.com> Cheers Tim, thanks for the tips. Just been checking out QIIME - trying OTU picking to check everything's still in place as we're retraining it with Silva - I'm getting an error where it expects a .jar for the classifier to be explicitly called version 2.2 (it's currently looking for it in /usr/share/rdp-classifier. I think we had this way back during the initial QIIME installation. From the package lists I have both rdp-classifier 2.5+repack-3 and bio-linux-rdp-classifier 2:1bl1-1 installed. I'm guessing the latter is the one that QIIME wants, can you confirm this is version 2.2 and if so I'll edit the name. Cheers Mike On 11 Oct 2012, at 14:31, Tim Booth wrote: > Hi Mike >> >> Internet restored. Ran the update script and the package list script >> and will forward both to you Tim, the list of things not installed is >> quite long - includes galaxy, raxml and a number of r-cran packages. > > OK, something has definitely jammed then. Hopefully the log will reveal > the problem (looking at it now). This also explains why NX didn't work > at all, as the upgrade also does some things to try and fix this. >> >> We can get around NX for the moment, I'll get people using putty or >> winSCP in the meantime, but it's really helpful for a number of the >> users that are used to desktop environments. After sorting the >> network connection, NX now working, but it seems much slower than it >> was and various bits of the desktop are missing, sidebar the most >> noticeable. > > The Unity desktop really depends on using the 3D capabilities of your > graphics card and so is really not suitable for NX or remote X in > general, hence you have to use the Gnome fallback as suggested by Tony, > or else move to something like Xfce. [ I'm not sure how > hard/problematic this could be - not tried it on Ubuntu ]. > > One thing to bear in mind - and this is useful even if NX desktop is > working perfectly - if that if a user can cope with the command line, > they can set the NX Desktop option to "Custom", click "Settings", set > Options to "Floating Window" and set Application to "gnome-terminal". > Then instead of a full desktop, a terminal window will appear. If you > run a graphical application from that terminal then that will likewise > appear. This is faster than a full desktop. >> >> Users definitely have ssh permissions as >> per http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux/accessing-bio-linux - >> interesting list of stuff after recent NX login in auth.log one of >> which seems to be related to a constant keychain message and the >> screen-saver lock, which doesn't clear with entering the user's >> password. >> > Not sure what to make of this. You mean you have the screensaver > running in the NX desktop window? I'd just disable it. > > More to follow off-list. > > Cheers, > > TIM > > -- > This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC > is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents > of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless > it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to > NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. > _______________________________________________ > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev From tony.travis at ed.ac.uk Thu Oct 11 10:25:01 2012 From: tony.travis at ed.ac.uk (Tony Travis) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:25:01 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> On 11/10/12 14:31, Tim Booth wrote: > [...] > The Unity desktop really depends on using the 3D capabilities of your > graphics card and so is really not suitable for NX or remote X in > general, hence you have to use the Gnome fallback as suggested by Tony, > or else move to something like Xfce. [ I'm not sure how > hard/problematic this could be - not tried it on Ubuntu ]. Hi, Tim. I've had Unity running under x2go: http://www.x2go.org/ This, apparently, is the direction Canonical want Ubuntu to go instead of using FreeNX. The snag is that x2go is NOT compatible with NX/FreeNX. > One thing to bear in mind - and this is useful even if NX desktop is > working perfectly - if that if a user can cope with the command line, > they can set the NX Desktop option to "Custom", click "Settings", set > Options to "Floating Window" and set Application to "gnome-terminal". > Then instead of a full desktop, a terminal window will appear. If you > run a graphical application from that terminal then that will likewise > appear. This is faster than a full desktop. How does that compare with just forwarding X11? ssh -CX user at host To me, the advantage of using a remote NX desktop is that I can work on a remote host the same way I would on a local desktop. Launching GUI apps from the command-line is how we used to use network transparency. A lot of X11 compressing/caching techniques were developed, culminating in the NX libraries. These make it practical to use a remote desktop. >> Users definitely have ssh permissions as >> per http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk/tools/bio-linux/accessing-bio-linux - >> interesting list of stuff after recent NX login in auth.log one of >> which seems to be related to a constant keychain message and the >> screen-saver lock, which doesn't clear with entering the user's >> password. >> > Not sure what to make of this. You mean you have the screensaver > running in the NX desktop window? I'd just disable it. I think this might be because a large number of packages 'recommended' by ubuntu-desktop are missing. That's what has happended on our server install. I'm looking into it, and comparing what Tim's script installed with the manifest of the casper filesystem on the Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Desktop iso. Bye, Tony. From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Thu Oct 11 11:35:11 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:35:11 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: <1349969711.2893.233.camel@balisaur> Hi, > I've had Unity running under x2go: > > http://www.x2go.org/ > > This, apparently, is the direction Canonical want Ubuntu to go instead > of using FreeNX. The snag is that x2go is NOT compatible with NX/FreeNX. OK, looks like this is something I need to look into, but since people like Mike are happy with NX I'll not switch the default system on BL unless I really have to. > How does that compare with just forwarding X11? > > ssh -CX user at host Doesn't require Windows user to start a separate Exceed (or Xorg) session. Significantly faster for some graphical apps, notably Java Swing interfaces. Otherwise, not much difference. > I think this might be because a large number of packages 'recommended' > by ubuntu-desktop are missing. That's what has happended on our server > install. I'm looking into it, and comparing what Tim's script installed > with the manifest of the casper filesystem on the Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS > Desktop iso. I deliberately only installed the ubuntu-desktop essentials because, as you said, a lot of the recommended stuff has no place on a server, but anything needed for remote desktop should indeed go on the list. Cheers, TIM -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. From tony.travis at ed.ac.uk Wed Oct 17 17:57:38 2012 From: tony.travis at ed.ac.uk (Tony Travis) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:57:38 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <1349969711.2893.233.camel@balisaur> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> <1349969711.2893.233.camel@balisaur> Message-ID: <507F29D2.1000601@ed.ac.uk> On 11/10/12 16:35, Tim Booth wrote: > Hi, > >> I've had Unity running under x2go: >> >> http://www.x2go.org/ >> >> This, apparently, is the direction Canonical want Ubuntu to go instead >> of using FreeNX. The snag is that x2go is NOT compatible with NX/FreeNX. > > OK, looks like this is something I need to look into, but since people > like Mike are happy with NX I'll not switch the default system on BL > unless I really have to. > >> How does that compare with just forwarding X11? >> >> ssh -CX user at host > > Doesn't require Windows user to start a separate Exceed (or Xorg) > session. > Significantly faster for some graphical apps, notably Java Swing > interfaces. > Otherwise, not much difference. > >> I think this might be because a large number of packages 'recommended' >> by ubuntu-desktop are missing. That's what has happended on our server >> install. I'm looking into it, and comparing what Tim's script installed >> with the manifest of the casper filesystem on the Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS >> Desktop iso. > > I deliberately only installed the ubuntu-desktop essentials because, as > you said, a lot of the recommended stuff has no place on a server, but > anything needed for remote desktop should indeed go on the list. Hi, Tim. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you about NX, but it took me a while to work out what was wrong. I notice that you install "freenx-server", instead of "freenx", and that the indicator panel is missing. The terminal font is unreadable (overlapping letters) and there is no "logout" button. I worked around the font problem by editing the default terminal proble and installed "indicator-applet-complete" to provide a logout button in the top right corner. I've now got NX in a more-or-les workable configuration, but I'm concerned that this did not happen when I installed "ubuntu-desktop" and "FreeNX" on an Ubuntu 12.04 LTS server instance manually (i.e. without your upgrade script). BTW, I used my "dpkg-dsel" script to compare what your script installs in comparison to the 64-bit Ubuntu-desktop 12.04.1 LTS casper manifest. HTH, Tony. From tony.travis at ed.ac.uk Wed Oct 17 19:42:17 2012 From: tony.travis at ed.ac.uk (Tony Travis) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:42:17 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <507F29D2.1000601@ed.ac.uk> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> <1349969711.2893.233.camel@balisaur> <507F29D2.1000601@ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: <507F4259.8020707@ed.ac.uk> On 17/10/12 22:57, Tony Travis wrote: > [...] > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you about NX, but it took me a > while to work out what was wrong. I notice that you install > "freenx-server", instead of "freenx", and that the indicator panel is > missing. The terminal font is unreadable (overlapping letters) and there > is no "logout" button. I worked around the font problem by editing the > default terminal proble and installed "indicator-applet-complete" to > provide a logout button in the top right corner. I've now got NX in a > more-or-les workable configuration, but I'm concerned that this did not > happen when I installed "ubuntu-desktop" and "FreeNX" on an Ubuntu 12.04 > LTS server instance manually (i.e. without your upgrade script). Hi, Tim. I've resolved the font problems when running the Gnome fall-back session under NX, but you're not going to like my solution! Ubuntu/Debian now install 'recommends' by default. However, your script does not and only installs the bare minimum. In particular, it does not install terminal fonts or, as noted previously, the indicator applet. I want to deploy a full Bio-Linux 7 desktop on a terminal server, so I've forced the installation of all "ubuntu-desktop" recommends: > aptitude purge ubuntu-desktop > aptitude install ubuntu-desktop > aptitude purge network-manager network-manager-gnome network-manager-pptp network-manager-pptp-gnome Note: The "network-manager*" packages should not be installed on a server. However, the other "ubuntu-desktop" recommends are as useful on a Bio-Linux terminal server as they are on a stand-alone Bio-Linux laptop/desktop. Next task - How to backup properly: WHY use "nepomuk" from KDE? Even the default, duplicity-based, Ubuntu backup is better than that! Bye, Tony. From tony.travis at ed.ac.uk Wed Oct 17 20:05:48 2012 From: tony.travis at ed.ac.uk (Tony Travis) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 01:05:48 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <507F4259.8020707@ed.ac.uk> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> <1349969711.2893.233.camel@balisaur> <507F29D2.1000601@ed.ac.uk> <507F4259.8020707@ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: <507F47DC.8080609@ed.ac.uk> On 18/10/12 00:42, Tony Travis wrote: > [...] > Next task - How to backup properly: WHY use "nepomuk" from KDE? > > Even the default, duplicity-based, Ubuntu backup is better than that! Hi, Tim. [Grovel] Sorry, I didn't notice that you included my backup script ;-) However, I bet I'm not the only one who gets caught out seeing "nepomuk backup" on the BL7 system admin menu... Bye, Tony. From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Thu Oct 18 04:58:01 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:58:01 +0100 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] NX and Backups In-Reply-To: <507F47DC.8080609@ed.ac.uk> References: <1DCCED50D0696A498958BA6B254456E2223BA7FB43@nerckwmb1.ad.nerc.ac.uk> <506326C4.5010300@minke.ukfsn.org> <50633140.6090505@ed.ac.uk> <506332E6.4040101@ed.ac.uk> <506341B4.6070702@ed.ac.uk> <50639513.8090907@ed.ac.uk> <5064275C.2040805@ed.ac.uk> <1348742067.4031.6.camel@balisaur> <50642CDD.8040708@ed.ac.uk> <1348743818.4031.24.camel@balisaur> <1348764601.4031.80.camel@balisaur> <1349097289.24717.1.camel@balisaur> <50769A00.5020500@ed.ac.uk> <92E0B035-4A94-4B01-A19D-ACC0AAEA264A@gmail.com> <1349962296.2893.205.camel@balisaur> <5076D6BD.1000103@ed.ac.uk> <1349969711.2893.233.camel@balisaur> <507F29D2.1000601@ed.ac.uk> <507F4259.8020707@ed.ac.uk> <507F47DC.8080609@ed.ac.uk> Message-ID: <1350550681.3081.128.camel@balisaur> Hi Tony, I did indeed keep the bio-linux-backups, with your TOH backup pattern, but I would also assume that users looking for backup in the Gnome control panel would find Deja Dup (Duplicity) which is the standard Ubuntu backup tool. I'm not sure where "nepomuk" is appearing from but I shall find it and smite it! Thanks for the continued help on NX. I'll ensure I have everything properly tested for remote access before I take BL7 out of beta testing. Cheers, TIM On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 01:05 +0100, Tony Travis wrote: > On 18/10/12 00:42, Tony Travis wrote: > > [...] > > Next task - How to backup properly: WHY use "nepomuk" from KDE? > > > > Even the default, duplicity-based, Ubuntu backup is better than that! > > Hi, Tim. > > [Grovel] Sorry, I didn't notice that you included my backup script ;-) > > However, I bet I'm not the only one who gets caught out seeing "nepomuk > backup" on the BL7 system admin menu... > > Bye, > > Tony. > _______________________________________________ > Bio-Linux-dev mailing list > Bio-Linux-dev at nebclists.nerc.ac.uk > http://nebclists.nerc.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux-dev -- Tim Booth NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Maclean Bldg, Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford, England OX10 8BB http://nebc.nerc.ac.uk +44 1491 69 2705 -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. From tbooth at ceh.ac.uk Wed Oct 31 11:54:44 2012 From: tbooth at ceh.ac.uk (Tim Booth) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:54:44 +0000 Subject: [Bio-linux-dev] Fwd: Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) In-Reply-To: <0D9F3C8D-6147-41AE-8482-9E59DC3470AF@gmail.com> References: <1E511FDC-EFD5-4C38-9BC8-7718D0924038@gmail.com> <0D9F3C8D-6147-41AE-8482-9E59DC3470AF@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1351698884.3081.496.camel@balisaur> Hi Mike, You shouldn't need to rename any files to make Qiime work, and if you do rename any file owned by a package it will interfere with updates so this is best avoided. The path to the RDP classifier is set in the file /usr/lib/qiime/shell/qiime_environment and it should be set to /usr/share/rdp-classifier/rdp_classifier.jar unless you override it with your own environment variable. Nothing in the current Qiime package refers to the version 2.2 jar explicitly. I'm wondering if you had a similar problem before and you set $RDP_CLASSIFIER manually but the setting you have is now wrong as I've neatened things up a bit. Can you please try doing "echo $RDP_CLASSIFIER" both in a regular shell and at a QIIME shell prompt? Then in a regular prompt try "env -u RDP_CLASSIFIER qiime" and again "echo $RDP_CLASSIFIER" at the prompt. That should reveal what is going on. Cheers, TIM On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 11:01 +0000, Michael Cox wrote: > Hi Tim, > > > I forgot to follow the below issue up with you whilst your were > tackling the update - does the classifier need updating, or am I OK > just to change the name of it? > > > Thanks > > > Mike > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: "Cox, Michael J" > > > > Subject: Re: [Bio-linux-dev] Upgrade to Bio-Linux 7 (at last) > > > > Date: 11 October 2012 15:02:44 BST > > > > To: Bio-Linux technical discussion > > > > > > > > Cheers Tim, > > > > thanks for the tips. > > > > Just been checking out QIIME - trying OTU picking to check > > everything's still in place as we're retraining it with Silva - I'm > > getting an error where it expects a .jar for the classifier to be > > explicitly called version 2.2 (it's currently looking for it > > in /usr/share/rdp-classifier. I think we had this way back during > > the initial QIIME installation. > > > > From the package lists I have both rdp-classifier 2.5+repack-3 and > > bio-linux-rdp-classifier 2:1bl1-1 installed. I'm guessing the > > latter is the one that QIIME wants, can you confirm this is version > > 2.2 and if so I'll edit the name. > > > > Cheers > > > > Mike > > -- This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.