<DIV>Dear Sir</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It seems that you are mixing the two issues which are very seprate, one is you provide under GPL and other is support at cost.</DIV>
<DIV>General user will never ask the support from you Because you provide Bio-Linux 3 Under GPL. After that what user does is his risk. Ours was general responce to future versions of Bio-Linux.It is upto you to consider or reject in the intrest of Linux community under GPL.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> With regards,<BR><BR>Mr.M.S.Yatnatti,<BR><BR>CEO, Biotechinfobytes,<BR><BR>Super Computer Aided Biotechnology center (SUCAB Center)<BR><BR>University of Agricultural Sciences, Hebbal Campus,<BR><BR>Bangalore - 560 024. (India)<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><B><I>bio-linux-request@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Send Bio-Linux mailing list submissions to<BR>bio-linux@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>http://www.bioinf.ceh.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux<BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>bio-linux-request@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>bio-linux-admin@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of Bio-Linux digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR>1. RE: Re: Bio-Linux future versions (Anderson, Rob A)<BR><BR>--__--__--<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Subject: RE: [Bio-Linux] Re: Bio-Linux future versions<BR>Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:30:00 -0000<BR>From: "Anderson, Rob A" <ROBERT.ANDERSON@IMPERIAL.AC.UK><BR>To: <BIO-LINUX@IVSUN01.NERC-OXFORD.AC.UK><BR><BR>This is a multi-part message in MIME
format.<BR><BR>------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F6E4.17A29E89<BR>Content-Type: text/plain;<BR>charset="US-ASCII"<BR>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable<BR><BR>It seems that you are asking for a lot of something that is being given<BR>away for free. Remember that EGTDC have to install, test and support<BR>every package that they include in BioLinux and that takes resources.<BR>Would your organization contribute the necessary resources for EGTDC to<BR>be able to include and support all the packages you request (and any<BR>interaction between them)? From a support point of view it is much<BR>simpler to include a core set of applications that cover most of the<BR>tasks people using a BioLinux box are likely to use, and then allow them<BR>to install and support their own specific packages on top of that.<BR>There is nothing to stop you installing your own extra applications on<BR>top of the BioLinux 3 distribution.<BR><BR>=20<BR><BR>Rob Anderson<BR><BR>Computing Support
Officer<BR><BR>Centre for Population Biology<BR><BR>Imperial College<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: bio-linux-admin@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk<BR>[mailto:bio-linux-admin@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk] On Behalf Of M.S<BR>YATNATTI<BR>Sent: 19 February 2004 11:54<BR>To: bio-linux@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk<BR>Subject: [Bio-Linux] Re: Bio-Linux future versions<BR><BR>=20<BR><BR>Dear All,=20<BR><BR>Thanks for the efforts taken by Centre For Ecology and Hydrology<BR>In our view, the direction in which center for ecology and Hydrology<BR>lead by Dan Swan for future Bio-linux version is throught provoking.<BR><BR>We have following suggestions to make;<BR><BR>1. It is suggested that the Bio-Linux version can continue on Redhat 9<BR>or Fedora 1 as in our view it does not make much difference for open<BR>source community whether Redhat goes commercial and support Fedora<BR>project. THe Redhat 9 will continue in the name of Fedora 1 (Instead of<BR>Redhat 10), The linux community is
mature and strong enough to support<BR>its continuity worldwide.<BR><BR>2. The Bio-Linux Future versions should contain OSCAR, GLOBUS, CONDOR,<BR>OPEN MOSIX, Sun Grid Engine(All must be included) user should have<BR>choice to use whatever he needs in whatever contest.<BR><BR>3. Bio-Linux should contain almost all Biotechnology, Bioinformatics,<BR>Medical informatics, Chem-informatics, proteomics, Bio-chemistry,<BR>chemistry, inlcuding visualization, modelling, graphic multi-media<BR>utilities and applications.All applications either they are RPM or tar.<BR>files can be installed in the system instead of converting all<BR>applications into rpm and making a installable distribution of Bio-Linux<BR>in CDs. As this will take still some time to take to convert all<BR>scientific application to RPM format. We are building up Bio-Linux in<BR>this direction.<BR><BR>4. All databases available opensource should be included in the Local<BR>server.<BR><BR>5. With regard to districution of this
type of Bio-linux system can be<BR>made in CDs or hard-discs by cloning the entire system on the hard disc<BR>or on CDs. Linux has many such utilities. SYstem Imager is very much<BR>fine when the installation is done at a Local LAN to 100s of nodes to<BR>build a cluster. But with regard with the internet installation it will<BR>have still bandwidth problem.<BR><BR>6. We request Dan Swan to send atleast Bio-Linux 3 cloning on CDs by<BR>using Linux utilities for Backup or system recovery or cloning the<BR>hard-discs by using free linux softwares.<BR><BR>With regards,<BR><BR>Mr.M.S.Yatnatti,<BR><BR>CEO, Biotechinfobytes,<BR><BR>Super Computer Aided Biotechnology center (SUCAB Center)<BR><BR>University of Agricultural Sciences, Hebbal Campus,<BR><BR>Bangalore - 560 024. (India)<BR><BR><BR><BR>bio-linux-request@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk wrote:<BR><BR>Send Bio-Linux mailing list submissions to<BR>bio-linux@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR>=09<BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit<BR>http://www.bioinf.ceh.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux<BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>bio-linux-request@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR>=09<BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>bio-linux-admin@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR>=09<BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more<BR>specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of Bio-Linux digest..."<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>Today's Topics:<BR>=09<BR>1. Bio-Linux future strategy (Dan Swan)<BR>=09<BR>-- __--__-- <BR>=09<BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:46:31 +0000<BR>From: Dan Swan=20<BR>Reply-To: dswan@ceh.ac.uk<BR>Organization: Centre For Ecology and Hydrology<BR>To: bio-linux@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk<BR>Subject: [Bio-Linux] Bio-Linux future strategy<BR>=09<BR>Dear all - here is a consultation document on the future of<BR>Bio-Linux -=20<BR>comments appreciated either on list or off list.<BR>=09<BR>For a breakdown on how we comnpared the distributions the<BR>delightfully=20<BR>coloured Excel
spreadsheet can be downloaded from:<BR>=09<BR>http://genomics.nox.ac.uk/~dswan/Linux_comparisons.xls<BR>=09<BR>Bio-Linux future directions - OS selection.<BR>-------------------------------------------<BR>=09<BR>Bio-Linux 3.0 and earlier versions were based on the popular Red<BR>Hat=20<BR>Liinux distribution. Red Hat will be dropping support for the<BR>freely=20<BR>available and distributable version of the Linux operating<BR>system (OS)=20<BR>in April 2004. This has prompted the need to review the Linux=20<BR>distributions currently available and to make a decision based<BR>on this=20<BR>review as to the best choice for the base of future Bio-Linux<BR>development.<BR>=09<BR>Issues of key importance to our decision include:<BR>=09<BR>Compatibility with the hardware provided to Environmental<BR>Genomics=20<BR>Thematic Programme Awardee Labs<BR>=09<BR>Level of difference in administration, interface and overall<BR>feel of the=20<BR>system compared to the current
Bio-Linux<BR>=09<BR>Overall level of user (and administrator)-friendliness<BR>=09<BR>Release schedule, automatic updating systems, versions of base<BR>system=20<BR>components<BR>=09<BR>Licensing issues for redistribution<BR>=09<BR>Documentation availability<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>In addition, we will take into account the mechanism by which<BR>the OS can=20<BR>be distributed as distribution via hard media rather than the<BR>current=20<BR>situation, using SystemImager software, would free a significant<BR>amount=20<BR>of time for EGTDC staff providing user support, and allow<BR>distribution=20<BR>of the Bio-Linux system to a wider audience with no significant<BR>support=20<BR>cost to the EGTDC. Associated with the distribution system, some<BR>OS=20<BR>versions provide an easy mechanism to produce "Live CD's" which<BR>would=20<BR>allow Bio-Linux to be demonstrated easily, for example at<BR>conferences,=20<BR>thus raising its profile. A live CD version would also enable<BR>people
to=20<BR>run a cut down version of Bio-Linux on machines without<BR>dedicating the=20<BR>machine to a Linux installation.<BR>=09<BR>Our testing is made up of several stages:<BR>=09<BR>from all the Linux distributions, choose those to be tested<BR>=09<BR>from those chosen, make choices for further testing based on<BR>obvious=20<BR>issues such as hardware incompatibility<BR>=09<BR>test a number of distributions further and choose two that will<BR>be=20<BR>tested by a larger group<BR>=09<BR>on the basis of all the above, decide on the OS on which to base<BR>the=20<BR>future development<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>Distributions chosen for testing<BR>=09<BR>There are many Linux distributions available. On the basis of<BR>our=20<BR>requirements, some distributions were immediately excluded from=20<BR>consideration:<BR>=09<BR>Gentoo was considered to be inappropriate for the remit of<BR>Bio-Linux as=20<BR>the installation process allows such fine grained control an<BR>install can=20<BR>take upwards
of a day and you must be extremely competent with<BR>Linux=20<BR>already.<BR>=09<BR>Debian was excluded on the basis that its install was too<BR>complex for=20<BR>people not familiar with Linux.<BR>=09<BR>Slackware was excluded as it lacks an integral modern system of<BR>package=20<BR>management (deb or rpm).<BR>=09<BR>Mandrake was excluded from initial consideration as it was close<BR>to=20<BR>receivership last year and there were worries about its long<BR>term future.<BR>=09<BR>The distributions reviewed include:<BR>=09<BR>Knoppix (a Live-CD distribution of Debian)<BR>Fedora<BR>SuSE<BR>DNALinux (a Slackware based Live-CD with some bioinformatics=20<BR>applications bundled)<BR>BioBrew<BR>Morphix (a "modular" Knoppix derivative )<BR>Mandrake<BR>MandrakeMove<BR>BioKnoppix<BR>=09<BR>Results of testing<BR>=09<BR>2 distributions failed to boot on our test hardware due to the<BR>inability=20<BR>to deal with 2 CPU machines and were immediately excluded
from<BR>further=20<BR>consideration:<BR>=09<BR>DNALinux<BR>Morphix<BR>=09<BR>These bugs were reported to the development teams responsible.<BR>=09<BR>1 distribution was excluded on the basis that the Live-CD format<BR>had no=20<BR>option to install to disk:<BR>=09<BR>MandrakeMove.<BR>=09<BR>The remaining distributions were tested further:<BR>=09<BR>Knoppix<BR>Fedora<BR>SuSE<BR>BioBrew<BR>BioKnoppix<BR>=09<BR>A brief overview of these distributions is given here, followed<BR>by the=20<BR>testing results:<BR>=09<BR>Knoppix<BR>=09<BR>Knoppix is probably the oldest and best known Live-CD<BR>distribution and=20<BR>has a long history of customisation for various purposes (see<BR>"Related=20<BR>Projects" at<BR>http://www.knopper.net/knoppix-links/index-en.html).=20<BR>Knoppix is of interest as it could be not only used as a<BR>Bio-Linux demo=20<BR>system at conferences, but could also be used in a teaching<BR>environment=20<BR>and most importantly of all can be installed onto the hard
disk<BR>of a=20<BR>machine to give a Debian install without the pain of a<BR>traditional=20<BR>Debian install. It has excellent hardware detection routines.<BR>=09<BR>Fedora<BR>=09<BR>The Fedora Project is a Red-Hat-sponsored and<BR>community-supported open=20<BR>source project. It is also a proving ground for new technology<BR>that may=20<BR>eventually make its way into Red Hat products. It is not a<BR>supported=20<BR>product of Red Hat, Inc. Fedora Core 1 is effectively Red Hat<BR>10.=20<BR>Fedora is of interest to us as this will most resemble the<BR>system=20<BR>Bio-Linux 3.0 and earlier are based upon. The configuration<BR>tools are=20<BR>largely unchanged from Red Hat 9.0. Whilst we can not make a<BR>Live-CD=20<BR>for Fedora we would be able to create a distribution based on<BR>it.<BR>=09<BR>SuSE<BR>=09<BR>SuSE is a German, but internationalised, distribution very much<BR>in Red=20<BR>Hat's image. They have a heavy focus on enterprise solutions<BR>like Red=20<BR>Hat and have
recently been acquired by Novell as a platform for<BR>the next=20<BR>generation or Novell products. SuSE has a highly integrated=20<BR>configuration GUI, much more advanced than Red Hat's.<BR>=09<BR>BioBrew<BR>=09<BR>BioBrew is a cluster focused Linux distribution which comes with<BR>some=20<BR>bioinformatics software preinstalled. For the most part, the<BR>programs=20<BR>included form a subset of those available on Bio-Linux. BioBrew<BR>is=20<BR>based on NCAPI/Rocks Linux, a derivative of Red Hat Advanced<BR>Server.=20<BR>Bio-Brew has the look and feel of a default Red Hat 7.3 install.<BR>=09<BR>Bio-Knoppix<BR>=09<BR>A derivative of Knoppix (see above). It includes some<BR>bioinformatics=20<BR>tools and is in early beta development (version 0.2 currently,<BR>version=20<BR>0.3 was recalled due to mastering problems); essentially it is<BR>Knoppix=20<BR>with a new splashscreen and KDE menus for some bioinformatics<BR>software=20<BR>(not all of which work). If Bio-Linux 4.0 was to be
derived from<BR><BR>Knoppix we would be using a clean Knoppix base rather than a<BR>derived=20<BR>system such as Bio-Knoppix.<BR>=09<BR>Summary of some positive and negative aspects of the different<BR>distributions<BR>=09<BR>Knoppix<BR>=09<BR>Positive:<BR>=09<BR>1)Once installed it never has to be upgraded with CD's<BR>2)Exceedingly stable code base<BR>3)Very long release cycle<BR>4)Can be used to make a Live-CD<BR>5)Strong remastering community<BR>6)Can be made to track stable releases, or testing releases when<BR>appropriate<BR>7)Installs a perfectly configured Debian system to disk.<BR>8)Excellent hardware detection and configuration<BR>=09<BR>Negative:<BR>=09<BR>1)Not as advanced GUI for systems administration<BR>2)Debian package management system - will be unfamiliar to RPM<BR>users<BR>=09<BR>Fedora<BR>=09<BR>Positive:<BR>=09<BR>1)It's the closest distribution to Bio-Linux<BR>2)Has reasonably advanced GUI configurations<BR>3)Have most in house administration experience on the
related<BR>RedHat=20<BR>platform<BR>4)Will be familiar to the Environmental Genomics user community<BR>5)Exceedingly easy to install=20<BR>=09<BR>Negative:<BR>=09<BR>1)Very new project, despite established base<BR>2)Focus on cutting edge -i.e. FC2 is 2.6 Kernel, 2.6 Gnome and<BR>we do not=20<BR>know how this will impact the software included on Bio-Linux<BR>3)Rapid release schedule: 2-3 releases a year to keep up with<BR>and remaster<BR>4)Releases not always out on date initially scheduled<BR>5)Cannot be made into a Live CD<BR>=09<BR>SuSE<BR>=09<BR>Positive:<BR>=09<BR>1)Exceedingly easy to install<BR>2)Centralised administration through yast2<BR>3)RPM based, therefore familiar to awardees<BR>4)Likely to be guaranteed to work with Novell products in the<BR>future.<BR>=09<BR>Negative:<BR>=09<BR>1)Licensing terms for redistribution are unclear<BR>2)There are no SuSE-derived releases on the market hence:<BR>3)There are no instructions for remastering SuSE<BR>4)Cannot be made into a
Live-CD<BR>5)There is the possibility of it "pulling a Red Hat" and<BR>focusing on=20<BR>Enterprise exclusively<BR>6)Will be remastering at least once a year (SuSE are slowing<BR>release=20<BR>dates for stability)<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>BioBrew<BR>=09<BR>Positive:<BR>=09<BR>1)Based on Red Hat and so would be familiar to Bio-Linux users<BR>and=20<BR>administrators<BR>2)Large installed base=20<BR>3)Ready to cluster<BR>4)Already has some bioinformatics applications installed<BR>=09<BR>Negative:<BR>=09<BR>1)Cannot be made into a Live-CD<BR>2)Based on outdated version of RHAS<BR>3)Text mode install=20<BR>4)Not at all focused on desktop usage<BR>=09<BR>Bio-Knoppix<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>This distribution has the same base list of positive and<BR>negative=20<BR>attributes as Knoppix, but also includes:<BR>=09<BR>Positive:<BR>=09<BR>1)Has some bioinformatics software preinstalled<BR>2)Some EMBOSS customisation has been done<BR>3)Menu customisations have been already implemented
for<BR>bioinformatics=20<BR>software<BR>=09<BR>Negative:<BR>=09<BR>1)Current version is at 0.2 and is clearly labeled beta<BR>2)Not all menus work<BR>3)All added software, bioinformatics and non-bioinformatics, has<BR>been=20<BR>installed into /usr/local<BR>4)Even if we used it as a base, we'd end up ripping out<BR>everything=20<BR>they've done and remastering it.<BR>=09<BR>Linux distributions chosen for further testing<BR>=09<BR>On the basis of the above results, two distributions were chosen<BR>at the=20<BR>Bio-Linux Development strategy meeting on February 13, 2004 for<BR>further=20<BR>testing as potential base systems for Bio-Linux:<BR>=09<BR>Fedora Core 1<BR>Knoppix<BR>=09<BR>Testing strategy:<BR>=09<BR>Two machines will be set up, one for each of the above<BR>distributions.=20<BR>Over the next two weeks, EGTDC staff will dedicate time to work<BR>on both=20<BR>systems. A final decision for the distribution to be used for<BR>further=20<BR>Bio-Linux development will be made on
February 27, 2004 on the<BR>basis of=20<BR>this testing.<BR>=09<BR>For those wishing to read up on what is happening in the Linux<BR>world=20<BR>there is an excellent article here on the relative market share<BR>of the=20<BR>top Linux variants:<BR>=09<BR>http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3313211<BR>--=20<BR>Dr Dan Swan - Bio-Linux Developer | RHCE<BR>EGTDC, CEH, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SR<BR>Tel: 01865 281 658 Fax: 018665 281 696<BR>http://envgen.nox.ac.uk/ | dswan@ceh.ac.uk<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>-- __--__-- <BR>=09<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Bio-Linux mailing list<BR>Bio-Linux@bioinf.ceh.ac.uk<BR>http://www.bioinf.ceh.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/bio-linux<BR>=09<BR>=09<BR>End of Bio-Linux Digest<BR><BR>_____ =20<BR><BR>Do you Yahoo!?<BR>Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard<BR><BR>1> - Read only the mail you want.<BR><BR><BR>------_=_NextPart_001_01C3F6E4.17A29E89<BR>Content-Type: text/html;<BR>charset="US-ASCII"<BR>Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>
<META content='3D"text/html;' http-equiv=3DContent-Type ="<br">charset=3Dus-ascii"><BR>
<META content='3D"Microsoft' name=3DGenerator (filtered)? 10 Word><BR><BR>
<STYLE><br><!--<br> /* Font Definitions */<br> @font-face<br> {font-family:Tahoma;<br> panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}<br> /* Style Definitions */<br> p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal<br> {margin:0cm;<br> margin-bottom:.0001pt;<br> font-size:12.0pt;<br> font-family:"Times New Roman";}<br>a:link, span.MsoHyperlink<br> {color:blue;<br> text-decoration:underline;}<br>a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed<br> {color:blue;<br> text-decoration:underline;}<br>p<br> {margin-right:0cm;<br> margin-left:0cm;<br> font-size:12.0pt;<br> font-family:"Times New Roman";}<br>p.Heading, li.Heading, div.Heading<br> {margin:0cm;<br> margin-bottom:.0001pt;<br> text-align:center;<br> font-size:14.0pt;<br> font-family:"Times New Roman";<br> text-decoration:underline;}<br>span.EmailStyle19<br> {font-family:Arial;<br> color:navy;}<br>@page Section1<br> {size:595.3pt 841.9pt;<br> margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}<br>div.Section1<br> {page:Section1;}<br>--><br></STYLE>
<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>
<DIV class=3DSection1><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT color=#3d0a00 face=3DArial size=3><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:<BR>10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>It seems that you are asking for a =<BR>lot of<BR>something that is being given away for free. Remember that EGTDC =<BR>have to install,<BR>test and support every package that they include in BioLinux and that =<BR>takes<BR>resources. Would your organization contribute the necessary =<BR>resources for<BR>EGTDC to be able to include and support all the packages you request =<BR>(and any<BR>interaction between them)? From a support point of view it is much =<BR>simpler<BR>to include a core set of applications that cover most of the tasks =<BR>people using<BR>a BioLinux box are likely to use, and then allow them to install and =<BR>support<BR>their own specific packages on top of that. There is nothing to =<BR>stop you<BR>installing your own extra applications on top of the BioLinux 3 =<BR>distribution.</SPAN></FONT></P><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT color=#3d0a00 face=3DArial size=3><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:<BR>10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </SPAN></FONT></P><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT color=#3d0a00 face=3DArial size=3><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:<BR>10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Rob Anderson</SPAN></FONT></P><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT color=#3d0a00 face=3DArial size=3><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:<BR>10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Computing Support =<BR>Officer</SPAN></FONT></P><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT color=#3d0a00 face=3DArial size=3><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:<BR>10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Centre for Population =<BR>Biology</SPAN></FONT></P><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT color=#3d0a00 face=3DArial size=3><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:<BR>10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Imperial</SPAN></FONT><FONT ="<br">size=3D2<BR>color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;<BR>color:navy'> </SPAN></FONT><FONT color=#3d0a00 size=3 ="<br">face=3DArial><SPAN<BR> =<BR>style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>College</SPAN></F=<BR>ont></P><BR><BR>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style="3D'margin-left: 36.0pt'"><FONT size=3 ="<br">face=3DTahoma><SPAN<BR>lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original<BR>Message-----<BR><BR><B><SPAN style="3D'font-weight: bold'">From:</SPAN></B> =<BR>bio-linux-admin@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk<BR>[mailto:bio-linux-admin@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk] <B><SPAN ="<br">style=3D'font-weight:<BR>bold'>On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>M.S YATNATTI<BR><BR><B><SPAN style="3D'font-weight: bold'">Sent:</SPAN></B> </SPAN></FONT><FONT ="<br">size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><SPAN lang=3DEN-US ="<br">style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>19<BR>February 2004</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3><SPAN ="<br">lang=3DEN-US<BR>style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> </SPAN></FONT><FONT<BR>size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><SPAN lang=3DEN-US ="<br">style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>11:54</SPAN></FONT><FONT<BR>size=3D2 face=3DTahoma><SPAN lang=3DEN-US
="<br">style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'><BR><BR><B><SPAN style="3D'font-weight: bold'">To:</SPAN></B><BR>bio-linux@ivsun01.nerc-oxford.ac.uk<BR><BR><B><SPAN style="3D'font-weight: bold'">Subject:</SPAN></B> [Bio-Linux] Re: =<BR><BR>=== message truncated ===</P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></SPAN><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailtag_us/*http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools?tool=1">Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard</a> - Read only the mail you want.</a>