Hi Ivo, Ivo Grosse wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > thanks a lot for your great and detailed email. We have come to almost > the same conclusions, in particular to > > > o life science clusters tend to be used to bulk process many totally > > independent "embarrassingly parallel" jobs > > o little if any use of parallel applications for sequence analysis > > Hence, I would like to ask the following provocative question to you > and the list: > > What is the advantage of a beowulf cluster over, say, a network of > workstations on which PBS (or any other batch system) is running? A beowulf cluster can have a batch system on it, so in that way there is no difference. A cluster of client workstations, using the clients idle cycles, works great until your thesis / CFO's budget / experimental results get destroyed by an errant batch process. If you have no clients on these workstations then you are back to a cluster again. That's just my opinion, I could be wrong. Jim > Ivo > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > http://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters