This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C29265.4F3E9990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Grace, -->"But this should be done through a lot of work, and make some scripts, right?" Yes, unfortunately the process is simple - but the implementation does take a little work. We (RLX Technologies) actually put a package together which runs on top of LSF called the RLX BLAST Cluster Solution where this is already done for you - with tons of configure options built in - you just use the same command line as you would for NCBI BLAST and the job runs on multiple nodes depending on the resources that are available. -->"I have no cluster in hand, I just install SGE on two separate Unix machines, so far, I can not think SGE can shorten certain job's running time, it just distribute the job to idle host, of course, if one host is too busy, it do not need wait, which will avoid the job packed on some hosts. But suppose all the host are idle, the submitted job still running on one host. So I want to know if there is big efficience difference between a collection of computer and real cluster." It's really hard to say what a "real cluster" is sometimes, but most times it is just a collection of computers with something like SGE on it. These clusters can be made to do things quite a bit faster than running a job on a single node - but that then gets back to how you use them. If you are not doing any scripting that partitions jobs then you will not see a real speed increase in your BLAST runs. SGE alone will not shorten a job's run time - it's only a toolbox that allows multiple computers to be used together - from which creative scripting can be done that will run jobs faster.... -- Mike McCardle Systems Software Engineer RLX Technologies, Inc. mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com <mailto:mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com> <http://www.rlxtechnologies.com/> http://www.rlxtechnologies.com [Mike McCardle] [Mike McCardle] -----Original Message----- From: bioinfo Gu [mailto:bioinfowistar@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:00 PM To: bioclusters@bioinformatics.org Subject: RE: [Bioclusters] How can I make blast job running short time on Gridengine Hi Mike, <mailto:mike.mccardle@rlx.com> Hi Grace, A popular method for running jobs on two different machines at once is to divide the input into parts, send each part to a different machine, run to program on each machine using the segment of the input on that machine, then combining the results. This is what's usually called an embarrassingly parallel method, where each job has 5 parts: 1) pre-processing (preparing data) on the submission host 2) data transfer to the nodes 3) processing on the execution nodes 4) data transfer back to the submission node, queuing of the results 5) post-processing (combining the results) on the submission host But this should be done through a lot of work, and make some scripts, right? So, for the case where you are using BLAST as the application, the database (or query) can be split on sequence boundaries, sent to each of the nodes for BLASTing, result files sent back to the submission host and combined to get the final result. This yields about 1/N performance depending on the efficiency of your configuration, where N is the number of nodes in your cluster. This would be one way of getting roughly 2x the performance our of your SGE cluster than what you would get out of a single machine. Another nice feature of some Distributed Resource Management (DRM) tools like (LSF, SGE ...) on clusters is that they do some level of load balancing. So, if you needed to run a job and needed it to have a fair chance of getting run with whatever everyone else is doing, the DRM would figure out which machine will give you the best service for your job. One nice feature of some schedulers in DRM packages (and they are not all equal!!) is that each user, group, job... can have a priority placed on it that will actually preempt other jobs, shuffle queuing... to get the right resources into the hands of the people who need them most.. I have no cluser in hand, I just install SGE on two separate unix machines, so far, I can not think SGE can shorten certain job's running time, it just distribute the job to idle host, of course, if one host is too busy, it do not need wait, which will avaoid the job packed on some hosts. But suppose all the host are idle, the submitted job still running on one host. So I want to know if there is big efficience difference between a collection of computer and real cluster. Look forward your suggestion. Grace Combining parallel (embarrassingly parallel) job execution with scheduling/load-balancing features of DRM tools is really the key to achieving the efficiency in a cluster that makes if a valuable resource for doing things like BLAST. ________________________________________ Mike McCardle Systems Software Engineer RLX Technologies, Inc. mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com <mailto:mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com> <http://www.rlxtechnologies.com/> http://www.rlxtechnologies.com From: bioinfo Gu [mailto:bioinfowistar@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:08 AM To: bioclusters@bioinformatics.org Subject: [Bioclusters] How can I make blast job running short time on Gridengine Hi all, I have two machines to install SGE. athena is master and excution host, apollo is only excution host. When I submit a job from master host with qsub, the job will be distributed to one of queue(one of host), and this job will be executed on this machinefor the whole process. I can not see Gridengine can save execution time when launch blast job on it. how can I save blast running time on Gridengine, do I have to use Parallel Environment? Also, how can I setup environmental variable for specific execution host in batch job script? For example: on one excution host: I need BLASTDB point to path1, on the second execution host, I want to set BLASTDB to path2, how can I do that? Thank you very much in advance. Grace _____ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com> Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com> now _____ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com> Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up <http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com> now ------_=_NextPart_001_01C29265.4F3E9990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002>Grace,</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002> -->"<SPAN class=754271417-21112002>But this should be done through a lot of work, and make some scripts, right?"</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>Yes, unfortunately the process is simple - but the implementation does take a little work. We (RLX Technologies) actually put a package together which runs on top of LSF called the RLX BLAST Cluster Solution where this is already done for you - with tons of configure options built in - you just use the same command line as you would for NCBI BLAST and the job runs on multiple nodes depending on the resources that are available. </SPAN></SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2> -->"</FONT><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>I have no cluster in hand, I just install SGE on two separate Unix machines, so far, I can not think SGE can shorten certain job's running time, it just distribute the job to idle host, of course, if one host is too busy, it do not need wait, which will avoid the job packed on some hosts. But suppose all the host are idle, the submitted job still running on one host. So I want to know if there is big efficience difference between a collection of computer and real cluster<SPAN class=580564615-22112002>."</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002>It's really hard to say what a "real cluster" is sometimes, but most times it is just a collection of computers with something like SGE on it. These clusters can be made to do things quite a bit faster than running a job on a single node - but that then gets back to how you use them. If you are not doing any scripting that partitions jobs then you will not see a real speed increase in your BLAST runs. SGE alone will not shorten a job's run time - it's only a toolbox that allows multiple computers to be used together - from which creative scripting can be done that will run jobs faster....</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002>--</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><SPAN class=580564615-22112002> <P><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>Mike McCardle <BR>Systems <SPAN class=580564615-22112002>Software </SPAN>Engineer <BR>RLX Technologies, Inc. <BR><A href="mailto:mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com">mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com</A> <BR></FONT><A target=_blank href="http://www.rlxtechnologies.com/"><FONT size=2>http://www.rlxtechnologies.com</FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></FONT></FONT></P></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002></SPAN></FONT></FONT></SPAN></SPAN></SPAN><FONT face=Tahoma><BR><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><FONT face=Arial size=2>[Mike McCardle] </FONT></SPAN><BR><FONT size=2><SPAN class=580564615-22112002><FONT face=Arial>[Mike McCardle] </FONT></SPAN>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> bioinfo Gu [mailto:bioinfowistar@yahoo.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:00 PM<BR><B>To:</B> bioclusters@bioinformatics.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Bioclusters] How can I make blast job running short time on Gridengine<BR><BR></DIV></FONT></FONT> <BLOCKQUOTE> <P>Hi Mike, <P><B><I> <A href="mailto:mike.mccardle@rlx.com"> </A></I></B> <META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>Hi Grace,</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002> A popular method for running jobs on two different machines at once is to divide the input into parts, send each part to a different machine, run to program on each machine using the segment of the input on that machine, then combining the results. This is what's usually called an embarrassingly parallel method, where each job has 5 parts:</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>1) pre-processing (preparing data) on the submission host</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>2) data transfer to the nodes</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>3) processing on the execution nodes</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>4) data transfer back to the submission node, queuing of the results</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>5) post-processing (combining the results) on the submission host</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>But this should be done through a lot of work, and make some scripts, right?</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>So, for the case where you are using BLAST as the application, the database (or query) can be split on sequence boundaries, sent to each of the nodes for BLASTing, result files sent back to the submission host and combined to get the final result. This yields about 1/N performance depending on the efficiency of your configuration, where N is the number of nodes in your cluster. This would be one way of getting roughly 2x the performance our of your SGE cluster than what you would get out of a single machine.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002> Another nice feature of some Distributed Resource Management (DRM) tools like (LSF, SGE ...) on clusters is that they do some level of load balancing. So, if you needed to run a job and needed it to have a fair chance of getting run with whatever everyone else is doing, the DRM would figure out which machine will give you the best service for your job. One nice feature of some schedulers in DRM packages (and they are not all equal!!) is that each user, group, job... can have a priority placed on it that will actually preempt other jobs, shuffle queuing... to get the right resources into the hands of the people who need them most.. </SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>I have no cluser in hand, I just install SGE on two separate unix machines, so far, I can not think SGE can shorten certain job's running time, it just distribute the job to idle host, of course, if one host is too busy, it do not need wait, which will avaoid the job packed on some hosts. But suppose all the host are idle, the submitted job still running on one host. So I want to know if there is big efficience difference between a collection of computer and real cluster.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>Look forward your suggestion.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>Grace</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=754271417-21112002>Combining parallel (embarrassingly parallel) job execution with scheduling/load-balancing features of DRM tools is really the key to achieving the efficiency in a cluster that makes if a valuable resource for doing things like BLAST. </SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><SPAN class=754271417-21112002><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff size=2>________________________________________ </FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV> <P><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>Mike McCardle <BR>Systems <SPAN class=754271417-21112002>Software </SPAN>Engineer <BR>RLX Technologies, Inc. <BR><A href="mailto:mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com">mike.mccardle@rlxtechnologies.com</A> <BR></FONT><A target=_blank href="http://www.rlxtechnologies.com/"><FONT size=2>http://www.rlxtechnologies.com</FONT></A><FONT size=2> </FONT></FONT></FONT></P> <P></SPAN><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> bioinfo Gu [mailto:bioinfowistar@yahoo.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:08 AM<BR><B>To:</B> bioclusters@bioinformatics.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Bioclusters] How can I make blast job running short time on Gridengine<BR><BR></FONT></P></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE> <P>Hi all,</P> <P>I have two machines to install SGE. athena is master and excution host, apollo is only excution host. When I submit a job from master host with qsub, the job will be distributed to one of queue(one of host), and this job will be executed on this machinefor the whole process. I can not see Gridengine can save execution time when launch blast job on it. how can I save blast running time on Gridengine, do I have to use Parallel Environment?</P> <P>Also, how can I setup environmental variable for specific execution host in batch job script? For example: </P> <P>on one excution host: I need BLASTDB point to path1, on the second execution host, I want to set BLASTDB to path2, how can I do that?</P> <P>Thank you very much in advance.</P> <P>Grace</P> <P><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2></FONT><BR> <HR SIZE=1> Do you Yahoo!?<BR><A href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Mail Plus</A> - Powerful. Affordable. <A href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Sign up now</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR> <HR SIZE=1> Do you Yahoo!?<BR><A href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Yahoo! Mail Plus</A> - Powerful. Affordable. <A href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail/mailsig/*http://mailplus.yahoo.com">Sign up now</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C29265.4F3E9990--