Just want to let everyone knows that SGEEE is also opensource. -Ron --- hanzl@noel.feld.cvut.cz wrote: > Sorry to repeat this old topic, but I see this > happen again and again: > > PEOPLE THINK THAT SGEEE IS NOT OPENSOURCE ! > > And some of them get upset and it is hard to explain > them that they > are mistaken. I spent quite big effort on > beowulf@beowulf.org to make > this clear but confused people arise again and > again. > > Please: > > - If you can find more suitable places where to put > bold label > "SGEEE is OPENSOURCE", please do it > > - Kindly verify my explanation below - I did not > intend to send a copy > here but later I realized that maybe I was too > speculative, so please > check that my claims are true. > > Thanks a lot > > Vaclav Hanzl > > ------- one of my beowulf posts - please verify my > claims: ----------- > > Subject: Re: sun grid engine? > From: hanzl > To: kus@free.net > Cc: beowulf@beowulf.org > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:12:03 +0100 > > > May be it's integrated into SGE 5.3 Enterprise > Edition ? I said about > > *free* SGE 5.3. Both "Sun ONE Grid Engine > Administartor and User's Guide" > > and "Sun ONE Grid Engine Release Notes" don't have > just the word "MAUI". > > Moreover, the only sheduler algorithm allowed in > usual > > (free) SGE 5.3 is "standard" (see SGE > Administrator & User's guide, p.225). > > It is easy to get confused by SGE versions. > > Enterprise Edition is also free. MAUI was integrated > with it - most of > this work was done by MAUI team with help from SGE > team. > > Regarding SGE versions, I think it works as follows: > > 1) Developers create opensource SGE version. They > work using publicly > available CVS software repository. All new features > come to this > version. > > This opensource version is both "SGE" ans "SGE > Enterprise Edition" - > the difference is just an instalation option. You > install both using > the same files, you may compile both using the same > sources from the > CVS archive. > > 2) 'Commercial' part of SUN takes these sources > (probably without any > important changes) and compiles 'commercial' SGE and > SGEEE. They add > word 'ONE' to the name. They create nice manuals. > You can buy this > software and get usual support you expect for > commercial software. > You can still download the manuals for free. Just > skip word 'ONE' > while reading them - they are perfectly usable for > free SGE as well. > They just may be out of date because the free > version already has new > features (like MAUI integration). They may also > never mention MAUI > integration because the 'commercial' part of SUN has > no support for > it. > > > All this is just too nice to believe it so people > often get confused. > > Note that it probably quite differs from PBS/OpenPBS > development model > - I am no expert on PBS (experienced experts, please > correct me if I > am wrong!) but I think that commercial PBS and > OpenPBS are split and > the development team has quite hard times deciding > what to do - they > introduce new features to commercial branch to make > it more attractive > (to make any money on it) but in the same time > similar features are > wanted in the OpenPBS version. They themselves > created their own enemy > on the market (OpenPBS) and now they are not sure > how to behave to it > - support it as their child? Kill it as their enemy? > > > Even if I am wrong in my thoughts on PBS (and I may > easily be wrong as > it is a long time I left PBS maillists) I am pretty > sure many PBS > users percieve it like this (as I got few quite few > emails from them > indicating this). > > PBS is older than SGE (and yes, PBS did many good > things, no doubt) > and everybody knew PBS when opensource SGE was born. > And many people > could easily expect that SGE used the same model as > PBS did. (It was > easy to think that SGE EE is the commercial version > - no, it is not.) > > SGE did not use the same model as PBS. It used more > open one. And this > choice was huge success I think. > > ... > > Regards > > Vaclav > > > ---- one more example of confusion ------- > > Subject: Re: sun grid engine? > From: Alan Scheinine <scheinin@crs4.it> > To: Beowulf@beowulf.org > Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:33:09 +0100 > > I see "Vaclav" posted a message. Last week we began > the installation > of SGE and someone involved with the installation > said that in order > to have the options of sgeee it is necessary to buy > that version. > Using grep on the messages I had saved, I found the > message from > Vaclav from the year 2001 showing how to convert sge > to sgeee. > In 2001 Vaclav said that the information was at the > end of the > download page, now it is in a readme file in the > distribution. > In any case, the note from Vaclav in 2001 proved to > be useful also > in 2003, the file is easily overlooked if the system > administrator > does not know it can be done. By the way, the file > is > <your SGE directory hierarchy > root>/README.inst_sgeee > Alan > > ---- I think Alan means this my old note: ----- > > Subject: SGEEE easily mistaken as commercial version > From: hanzl@noel.feld.cvut.cz > To: dev@gridengine.sunsource.net, > beowulf@beowulf.org > Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:22:40 +0200 > > Prospective SGE users could very easily be mistaken > and suppose that > Enterprise Edition is a commercial close source > version. If you > download the three tarfiles from "Binary Downloads" > page, unpack them > and look around, you will install non-EE version. > There is no way to > find easily (from unpacked files) that you could > install EE. The pdf > manual will tell you about EE features but your > instalation is missing > them. No hint at all that EE is also opensource. > > This IMHO seriously harms the SGE project and should > be corrected as > soon as possible by including inst_sgeee script in > tar files. > > Potential SGE users and opensource co-developers are > likely to know > PBS, which exists in both opensource and commercial > version. During SGE > test-install many of them will be systematically > driven into false > assumption that SGE project is organised the same. > > I wish all the best to Veridian and PBS and > everybody making free > versions of commercial software. This setup of > things however > inevitably makes opensource users to assess danger > that core > developement team will be torn between opensource > and commercial > version support, will be reluctant to port > commercial version fixes to > opensource version (cause it takes time) and will be > unable to > integrate opensource-community created patches cause > without knowledge > of the commercial version source these patches will > diverge. > > It is very sad to have these worries about SGE by > mistake. > > > Only after lot of hacking around I found that all > you have to do to > install EE is to rename inst_sge to inst_sgeee (and > it behaves > accordingly). Only after this I looked around once > more and found this > at the bottom of binary download page: > > Only for Grid Engine Enterprise Edition you have to > make slight modifications: > % cd $SGE_ROOT > % ln -s inst_sge inst_sgeee > % replace inst_sge with inst_sgeee in the last line > of the files install_qmaster and install_execd > Then you can proceed as with the standard Grid > Engine installation. > > Well, you may say it is my fault not to notice this > before. Sure it is > but I think this fault is quite common and harms SGE > a lot. It is > worth it to include inst_sgeee in tar files now as > many Beowulf > maillist readers might be prompted by recent SGE > discussions to go and > try SGE - and maybe forget about it if they make the > same mistake as I > did. > > > With all the best wishes to SGE team (and thanks for > all the work done > so far) > > Vaclav > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@gridengine.sunsource.net > For additional commands, e-mail: > users-help@gridengine.sunsource.net > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com