Hi Nathan: I just ran into this myself. I built the binaries on RedHat GinGin64 with the gcc-3.3 compiler. I just tried a SUSE 8.2 platform, and had to recompile the toolkit. If you want to use the binary, I think you need the relevant gcc tree installed. I think I might have that here. I will look. For reasons that are not all that clear to me now, I had to use the -m32 flag to generate a working binary on SUSE. The -m32 forces the use of the IA32 ABI, which means that you cannot use some of the nicer features of the Opteron (large memory, 64 bit mode, etc). I hope to investigate this more. A kind soul just gave me access to their opteron for some testing. Compiling with -m64 generates a binary, though upon completion of a test run, it generates an ABORT. Strace wasn't all that helpful here. I am trying to track this down. I can give you my -m32 binaries if you would like. I would like to get the -m64 binaries working (for SUSE). Joe On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 22:58, Nathan Siemers wrote: > Hello Joe, > > My default SUSE opteron configuration may not have the libs to run your > build: > > > opt:/u1/gcgblast # formatdb -p F -i test & > formatdb: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by > formatdb) > [1] 10941 > [1] Exit 1 formatdb -p F -i test > opt:/u1/gcgblast # ldd /usr/local/bin/formatdb > /usr/local/bin/formatdb: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found > (required by /usr/local/bin/formatdb) > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000002a9566a000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000002a957c2000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 > (0x0000002a95556000) > > > I assume these are 64 bit executables? Is there a newer libc needed? > > Thanks for your (past and present) help with the opteron platform. > > Nathan > > > > Joseph Landman wrote: > > >Hi Doug: > > > > These are 2.2.6. The tree's VERSION (ncbi/VERSION) reads: > > > >[landman@squash.scalableinformatics.com:/big/t/ncbi] > >8 >cat VERSION > >Tue Apr 22 10:41:40 EDT 2003 > > > > Please let me know if you have problems with them. This was a first > >pass at getting working systems. > > > >Joe > > > >On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 20:17, Doug Shubert wrote: > > > > > >>Hello Joe, > >>What version of ncbitools are you working with ? > >>Doug > >> > >>Joe Landman wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Its up. Please let me know if it works. This is a snapshot from a > >>>build done in June, Download is > >>>http://scalableinformatics.com/downloads/opteron.ncbitools.tar.gz . It > >>>is 29MB. > >>> > >>>Joe > >>> > >>>On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 15:46, Joe Landman wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 13:11, Nathan Siemers wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>That's great news, Joe. Has this build passed any regression tests, > >>>>>i.e. rigorous > >>>>>comparison to output from blastall on other architectures? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>I have not had an opteron to run on long enough to run my normal tests. > >>>>It did generate the same results for my short tests. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>-- > >>>Joseph Landman, Ph.D > >>>Scalable Informatics LLC, > >>>email: landman@scalableinformatics.com > >>>web : http://scalableinformatics.com > >>>phone: +1 734 612 4615 > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > >>>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > >>> > >>> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > >>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Scalable Informatics LLC email: landman@scalableinformatics.com web: http://scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 612 4615