(Added Biodevelopers to the thread.) There's a discussion about this on Slashdot, including mention of the Fedora project: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/03/1749259 Cheers. Jeff Chris Dagdigian wrote: > > Another item that has been on my mind recently... > > What are people doing about RedHat deciding to kill off their consumer > product line? Are people going to pay the freight for Redhat Enterprise > Linux or are people just going to use Suse/Debian/Gentoo etc. > > My needs are pretty simple but I'm having a hard time placing myself > into Redhat's current product plans. > > I need: > > 1. A stable OS with a product lifetime of at least 1 year (ideally 2+) > 2. Product errata, updates and security patches for full lifespan > 3. No OS or product phone/email support or SLA > > The RHL transition to Fedora Linux is fine but it sounds as if the OS is > going to change very fast (major updates 2-3 times per year). On the > plus side it is still free and the leaders seem committed to fast errata > and security updates. Still I can't see using this on a production > cluster due to the pace of change and the chance that I'd be left > without updates if I froze on a particular Fedora release. > > I can justify (maybe) the cost for the $125 product (Redhat WS) that > they are pitching towards compute clusters. The update services and > 5-year product lifespan is worth paying for. The big question for me is > what do I have to pay _after_ the initial $125 purchase. I can't seem to > find any info on the Redhat website telling me how much I'll have to pay > for updates after my intial 1-year RedHat Network service runs out. > > This also leaves the question of what RHEL flavor to run on cluster head > nodes, fileservers and database machines. $349 for RH ES could be > justified for a critical node but damn what if I want to run that stuff > on Opteron or Itanium or a node with 4CPUs? The cost for RH AS (starting > at $1400) is not justifiable to me. Putting a 'cheap' RHEL flavor on a > head node and manually compiling/updating/supporting additional network > services built by hand from source or .srpms may be more of an > operational headache than the cost savings justify. > > I'm torn right now between diving back into Gentoo/Debian or possibly > jumping on the Suse bandwagon given their existing support for Opteron > etc. Novell just bought Suse today so who knows what that is going to do. > > I'd be interested in knowing how current RHL users are planning the > transition and how future cluster buyers are changing their plans. > Personally I think I'm going to need to stay on top of RHEL for project > that demand it while also maintaining some sort of deep familiarity with > one or more alternatives. > > -Chris > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff@bioinformatics.org President, Bioinformatics.Org http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "As we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously." -- Benjamin Franklin --