Does anyone know of a publically maintained RPM directory which the community could synchronize against? The redHat channel is not the only way I heard. What hope FreeBSD? J.W. Bizzaro said: > (Added Biodevelopers to the thread.) > > There's a discussion about this on Slashdot, including mention of the Fedora > project: > > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/03/1749259 > > Cheers. > Jeff > > Chris Dagdigian wrote: >> >> Another item that has been on my mind recently... >> >> What are people doing about RedHat deciding to kill off their consumer product >> line? Are people going to pay the freight for Redhat Enterprise Linux or are >> people just going to use Suse/Debian/Gentoo etc. >> >> My needs are pretty simple but I'm having a hard time placing myself into >> Redhat's current product plans. >> >> I need: >> >> 1. A stable OS with a product lifetime of at least 1 year (ideally 2+) 2. >> Product errata, updates and security patches for full lifespan 3. No OS or >> product phone/email support or SLA >> >> The RHL transition to Fedora Linux is fine but it sounds as if the OS is going >> to change very fast (major updates 2-3 times per year). On the plus side it is >> still free and the leaders seem committed to fast errata and security updates. >> Still I can't see using this on a production cluster due to the pace of change >> and the chance that I'd be left without updates if I froze on a particular >> Fedora release. >> >> I can justify (maybe) the cost for the $125 product (Redhat WS) that they are >> pitching towards compute clusters. The update services and 5-year product >> lifespan is worth paying for. The big question for me is what do I have to pay >> _after_ the initial $125 purchase. I can't seem to find any info on the Redhat >> website telling me how much I'll have to pay >> for updates after my intial 1-year RedHat Network service runs out. >> >> This also leaves the question of what RHEL flavor to run on cluster head nodes, >> fileservers and database machines. $349 for RH ES could be justified for a >> critical node but damn what if I want to run that stuff on Opteron or Itanium >> or a node with 4CPUs? The cost for RH AS (starting at $1400) is not justifiable >> to me. Putting a 'cheap' RHEL flavor on a head node and manually >> compiling/updating/supporting additional network services built by hand from >> source or .srpms may be more of an >> operational headache than the cost savings justify. >> >> I'm torn right now between diving back into Gentoo/Debian or possibly jumping >> on the Suse bandwagon given their existing support for Opteron etc. Novell just >> bought Suse today so who knows what that is going to do. >> >> I'd be interested in knowing how current RHL users are planning the transition >> and how future cluster buyers are changing their plans. Personally I think I'm >> going to need to stay on top of RHEL for project that demand it while also >> maintaining some sort of deep familiarity with one or more alternatives. >> >> -Chris >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org >> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters > > > -- > J.W. Bizzaro jeff@bioinformatics.org President, > Bioinformatics.Org http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "As we enjoy great > advantages from the inventions of others, we > should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention > of ours; and this we should do freely and generously." > -- Benjamin Franklin > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Biodevelopers mailing list > Biodevelopers@bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/biodevelopers