I would suggest taking your disks out of RAID 0. See: http://www.storagereview.com/php/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=SingleDriveVsRaid0 The other FAQs at storage review may be worth your time as well. To summarize: RAID 0 has decreased reliability over a single drive. Despite having increased sequential transfer rates, non-sequential access patterns (e.g. server/multi-user usage) are better for data distributed across two independent drives than with RAID 0 in general. If you insist on RAID, you should sacrifice capacity and do RAID 1, buying you increased reliability, better seek times than RAID 0, and equivalent transfer rates to RAID 0 (assuming you've got a decent controller). -Aaron On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, karthik viswanathan wrote: > > We have a PowerEdge 4600 server running RedHat 9. The system spec is given below. > > Server Specs: > > Dell PowerEdge 4600 > Intel Xeon 2800 MHz Processor > 4096 MB ECC DDR Ram > 512 Cache > 2 x 146 GB SCSI hard disks (RAID 0) > OS : RedHat 9 (kernel 2.4.20-8), file system - ext3 > > The main usage of this server is for bioinformatics computational work. Clients > run search/match C or C++ programs on this server through protocols like ssh. > The no of clients will be not more than 4. This server is also acting as a file > server for the same clients. T Get 3 newhe performance is not satisfactory so we > are planning to do some modification in the configuration. One of our plan is > promote a client workstation(dell precision-340, 1.5 GHz & 1GB ram) to a file > server and switch the two SCSI hard disk from the PowerEdge server to this > workstation. Add 3 new SCSI hard disk (37 GB) to the PowerEdge server and set a > RAID 0, if possible also add a second identical processor to the server. > > We are interested to know if this will improve the performance of the > computational server. Also it would be helpful if you could suggest any other > alternatives for improving the computational performance for bioinformatics > work. If any of you have poweredge 4600 please share your experience and ur > system configuration. Suggestions on disk partitioning, kernel and file system > to use will also be helpful > > Thanks for your time and help > Karthik > > > PS: We are more interested to improve the computational power than file handling! > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters >