Hi Joe: Thanks for ur reply. " T Get 3 newhe performance ..." this is a typo error, sorry about that. I am surprised how this got appended! it should have been "The performance is not satisfactory ..." The programs the client run mostly are 1. LUCY (http://www.tigr.org/software/) 2. GENESEQER (http://bioinformatics.iastate.edu/bioinformatics2go/gs/help.html) I had ran hdparm # /sbin/hdparm -tT /dev/sda2 /dev/sda2: Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.25 seconds =512.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.75 seconds = 36.57 MB/sec This output i have run two days back. I have installed bonnie++, but a client is running a program for the past two days so i couldnt run bonnie++ since i fear the output wont be correct. We dont have a software raid, but we have hardware raid. I am not sure about the chunk size though. Will i be able to see this while system reboot or can i check on linux ? Yes we are running NFS. The network speed is 100Mbs but the usage of the file system is not often since the no of clients is 4. Aaron: There are two hard SCSI hard disks of 146 GB each set on a RAID 0 Thanks Karthik Hi Karthik: On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 15:04, karthik viswanathan wrote: > We have a PowerEdge 4600 server running RedHat 9. The system spec is given > below. > [...] > > The main usage of this server is for bioinformatics computational work. Clients > > run search/match C or C++ programs on this server through protocols like ssh. > > The no of clients will be not more than 4. This server is also acting as a file > > server for the same clients. T Get 3 newhe performance is not satisfactory so we > > I can't parse this "T Get 3 newhe performance is not satisfactory". I > assume that you meant something like > > "To get 3 new ..." > > and then I lost the meaning. Could you elaborate a bit more? > > > are planning to do some modification in the configuration. One of our plan is > > promote a client workstation(dell precision-340, 1.5 GHz & 1GB ram) to a file > > server and switch the two SCSI hard disk from the PowerEdge server to this > > workstation. Add 3 new SCSI hard disk (37 GB) to the PowerEdge server and set a > > RAID 0, if possible also add a second identical processor to the server. > > > > We are interested to know if this will improve the performance of the > > computational server. Also it would be helpful if you could suggest any other > > alternatives for improving the computational performance for bioinformatics > > work. If any of you have poweredge 4600 please share your experience and ur > > Most important questions: > > 1) what software are you running, what type of inputs, what size data > sets > > 2) have you run any of the standard system performance viewing tools? > > 3) what are the contents of your /etc/raidtab if you are using a > software RAID0, and if not, what is the chunk size on the hardware > RAID0? > > 4) are you running NFS? What is your network speed? What are the > chipsets? > > Initial observations: > > 1) ext3 is not as good as some of the other file systems for specific > work loads. It might be worth looking into XFS > > 2) many bioinformatics tools are great with a divide and conquer > approach. If we understood what tools you are running this might help > facilitate this discussion. > > > system configuration. Suggestions on disk partitioning, kernel and file system > > to use will also be helpful > > Lots of tuning possibilities, but we don't know where your systems hot > spots are yet. > > > > > Thanks for your time and help > > Karthik > > > > > > PS: We are more interested to improve the computational power than file handling! > > Sometimes the two are very much related. > > Joe > > > -- > Joseph Landman, Ph.D > Scalable Informatics LLC, > email: landman@scalableinformatics.com > web : http://scalableinformatics.com > phone: +1 734 612 4615 > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters >