Hi Nick: There are many different toolkits that simplifies the building of a cluster for you. Some are generic (OSCAR, ROCKS) and some are more specific (BioBrew has a lot of Bioinformatics tool pre-packaged). It really depends on what you want. BioBrew has its own cd distribution because like ROCKS, they compile Red Hat Enterprise Linux from source, so it is self-contained. OSCAR, on the other hand, installs on top of an existing Linux distribution, so if you are particular about what Linux you like, then you can give OSCAR a try. What sort of kernel re-compile issues are you encountering with Fedora Core 2? We are actually also working on support for Fedora Core 3 as we speak, so perhaps the issue you are talking about can be resolved. Disclaimer: I am a core developer of OSCAR :) Cheers, Bernard > -----Original Message----- > From: bioclusters-bounces at bioinformatics.org > [mailto:bioclusters-bounces at bioinformatics.org] On Behalf Of > Nick D'Angelo > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:35 > To: 'bioclusters at bioinformatics.org' > Subject: [Bioclusters] FW: cluster newbie > > > > All, > > I am sure this has been asked many times before, but what is > the preferred method or perhaps 'best' method of clustering a > few 3-5 RedHat or other Linux flavours to best suit our > Bioinfo R and D group? > > I have come across biobrew with their own cd distribution > install and also this group. > > I was going to originally look at Fedora core 2, but that > appeared to be painful due to the kernel re-compile and to be > honest, the documentation appeared to be quite poor, at least > what I found. > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Nickd > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters at bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters >