[Biococoa-dev] more ramblings
Koen van der Drift
kvddrift at earthlink.net
Fri Dec 3 20:57:35 EST 2004
On Dec 3, 2004, at 8:44 PM, Alexander Griekspoor wrote:
>> No, it doesn't. That's why I made it such that if you pass it to a
>> protein, the result will just be an empty sequence. This is actually
>> a good example of what I mean by putting the convenience methods
>> only in BCSequence.
> I know, but again at some point it doesn't make any sense anymore,
> than we can just as well get rid of the subclasses if that's where you
> are pointing at (again ;-).
No, it's actually fine with me to put them in the DNA/RNA subclasses
only. I guess I got carried away by my cleanup mode. What I actually
wanted to do is to replace the current complement methods with the
More information about the Biococoa-dev