[Biococoa-dev] Moving on

[Charles Parnot]

On Jul 10, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:

>
> On Jul 10, 2005, at 8:21 PM, Charles Parnot wrote:
>
>
>> Anyway, can you explain again the rationale to have a superclass  
>> for both BCSymbol and BCSequence? I know you already did explain  
>> it but I can't find the email.
>>
>>
>
> See here:
>
> http://bioinformatics.org/pipermail/biococoa-dev/2005-June/001355.html
>
> I have reattached the UML files too.
>
> cheers,
>
> - Koen.

Thanks!
Yes, this is what I rememebered. What I did not understand in your  
email today is why BCStructureObject was also the superclass for  
sequence. It make sense to have atomes, residues, symbol,  
functionalGroup,... be all in the same class tree.  But the sequence  
does not seem to belong there. Is it just because of the name ivar?

charles

--
Xgrid-at-Stanford
Help science move fast forward:
http://cmgm.stanford.edu/~cparnot/xgrid-stanford

Charles Parnot
charles.parnot at gmail.com