[Biococoa-dev] BioCocoa license
Koen van der Drift
kvddrift at earthlink.net
Tue Oct 28 16:10:26 EDT 2008
I don't recall what the original license was, but yes, at one point in time we decided to move to CC. I could look at home in my email box what the reasoning was for that, or you may find it in the archives. Does Debian require a GPL license, or is CC also allowed? I'm fine with adding a list of authors, and removing "The BioCocooa Team". Please add Charles Parnot to the list of authors.
>From: Scott Christley <schristley at mac.com>
>Sent: Oct 28, 2008 3:39 PM
>To: biococoa <biococoa-dev at bioinformatics.org>
>Subject: [Biococoa-dev] BioCocoa license
>I have been working with a Debian group to get BioCocoa included as a
>standard Debian package. One of the things that needs to be resolved
>is the license for BioCocoa.
>There is both a Copying.txt which has GPL V2 and license.txt which has
>Creative Commons BT-SA-2.5, but all the source code files seem to
>mention that they are covered by creative commons. Am I correct in
>assuming that BioCocoa was originally under the GPL, but it was
>decided to move to creative commons?
>Also, many of the file mention the copyright held by "The BioCocoa
>Project". I've been following that convention with the new files I
>create. However, The BioCocoa Project is not a legal entity, like a
>real non-profit organization, is that right? If that is the case, I
>think it would be more appropriate that individual authors held
>copyright to files. We cannot assign copyright to a virtual entity,
>and to be truly legal we would need legal documents from each author,
>which is a pain. I think we can have an Authors.txt file which lists
>all the contributors as a way of recognition.
>Here are all the authors I could pull out from the source code files,
>am I missing anybody?
>Koen van der Drift
>Lastly there are some files mentioning Mekentosj.com and require that
>"credit is given in all documents and publicity". This requirement
>isn't going to fly with Linux distributions because in theory they
>would have to add this to their website, etc. etc. Can this
>restriction be removed? I don't think that these files are actually
>being compiled right now but they are in the source.
>Biococoa-dev mailing list
>Biococoa-dev at bioinformatics.org
More information about the Biococoa-dev