At 09:55 -0500 on 01/09/2003, you wrote: >I have run some comparisons of BLASTN searches between Apple Xserves >(clustered and not clustered) vs large shared memory machines >(sorry, no intel comparisons). See http://blastcompare.tamu.edu for >details. Not surprisingly, the the Xserves were fastest at small >word size. It could have been interesting to perform the same tests with WU-BLAST instead of AG-BLAST. The tests I ran a while ago showed that WU-BLAST seemed to have a much better G4 optimization. I've heard that it deals very well with multiple processors as well. Corentin