[BioDarwin] BLASTN benchmarks
Corentin Cras-Méneur
cortig.biolists at free.fr
Tue Sep 2 11:20:09 EDT 2003
At 09:55 -0500 on 01/09/2003, you wrote:
>I have run some comparisons of BLASTN searches between Apple Xserves
>(clustered and not clustered) vs large shared memory machines
>(sorry, no intel comparisons). See http://blastcompare.tamu.edu for
>details. Not surprisingly, the the Xserves were fastest at small
>word size.
It could have been interesting to perform the same tests with
WU-BLAST instead of AG-BLAST. The tests I ran a while ago showed that
WU-BLAST seemed to have a much better G4 optimization. I've heard
that it deals very well with multiple processors as well.
Corentin
More information about the BioDarwin
mailing list