That setting can inhibit discussions on the list. Perhaps the bounties should clearly indicate REPLY OFF-LINE and an address. David -----Original Message----- From: biodevelopers-bounces+david.lapointe=umassmed.edu at bioinformatics.org [mailto:biodevelopers-bounces+david.lapointe=umassmed.edu at bioinformatics .org] On Behalf Of Titus Brown Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:21 AM To: General discussions about software development in bioinformatics Subject: Re: [Biodevelopers] Programming bounties On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:16:07AM -0400, Joe Landman wrote: -> Why not create a list just for the bounties? You could also just set list Reply-To to the sender only. Most lists I'm on are configured that way, and it really cuts down on the gratuitous "me too!" traffic. --titus -> J.W. Bizzaro wrote: -> >Hi guys, -> > -> >I was wondering if you think we should permit or ban such -> >announcements. I personally don't have a problem with them (they're -> >certainly helpful to the parties that would be involved), but people -> >need to reply directly to the poster (sender) of the announcement if -> >it's not a topic of discussion. I'm sure that no one here wants to -> >get messages saying, "No thanks" and, "I'd like to help." :-) -> > -> >What do you think? People tend show their objection by simply -> >unsubscribing, but we don't want that. -> > -> >Cheers, -> >Jeff _______________________________________________ Biodevelopers mailing list Biodevelopers at bioinformatics.org https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/biodevelopers