Hi, I learned perl/bioperl at a bioinformatics course and they also encouraged us to make our own functions/routines, nevertheless I personally prefer using something that is already done, maybe modify-it to suit my personal needs instead of writing from scratch. My main rule is: "If it has already been done, use-it, if not, build-it yourself". If you use everything as is, you may end up using loads of modules for simple functions, in that case I think its preferable to compile the needed functions in a new, application specific module, as it is more resource friendly this way. Best Regards, Afonso Phil- wrote: > Hi, all! > > I've been working using bioperl, EnsEMBL API, TFBS and some other perl module for bioinformatic research for some time. So of course I want to write my own module, too. But when joining the other research groups, I found that some of them do not ever use those modules like bioperl. > What I really want to ask is, > > Are these modules such as bioperl really improving our efficiency? Or are they improving our efficiency at some kind of work and decreasing at the others? How can we decide when to use these modules or not? Besides, when I should give some time on moduling my own codes? > > Thank you very much! > > > Phil- > phil- at 126.com > 2006-10-19! > > > Phil- > phil- at 126.com > 2006-10-19 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Biodevelopers mailing list > Biodevelopers at bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/biodevelopers >