On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:25:37AM -0800, Martin Gollery wrote: -> My apologies, Chris, I see what you are saying and you are correct- -> S/W is not a good program for genome/genome comparisons because it -> does not show all the sub-optimal alignments. Somebody modified it so -> that it would do this, but I can't recall the name. -> -> Double-affine S/W will do much better at this sort of thing, but it -> fails to catch rearrangements- this is not what it is designed for. -> Double-affine S/W would be ok if the genomes are close, but not -> otherwise. There is a large literature on the subject of aligning genomes that is not being mentioned here ;). For animal genomes, I would suggest looking at the blastz and MultiPipMaker work from Penn State in particular, as well as the VISTA work at LBL. I'm less familiar with whole-genome microbial analyses but then again they're relatively tractable (computationally)... E-mail me if you need specific refs. cheers, --titus