[cmview-devel] Conventions for Graphical representation for protein annotations

[Dan Bolser]

Also the Jalview mailing list could be a good place to ask.

jalview-discuss at jalview.org



On 28 February 2011 12:02, Henning Stehr <stehr at molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
> Hi Leyla,
>
> I'd recommend posting this question to the pdb-l
> (https://lists.sdsc.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/pdb-l).
>
> Maybe someone there can help.
>
> Cheers,
> Henning
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Leyla Garcia <ljgarcia at ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I need to know if there is a key of colours and shapes for the graphical
>> representation of annotations in proteins. for instance, if I need to have a
>> pictorial representation of a "domain" or "transcript" then is there a
>> standardized way to do it? So far I have seen that domains are usually
>> represented as ellipses or rectangles, and metal bindings as non-filled
>> circles, while active sites are red-filled circles.
>> I am particular interested in the next type of annotations:
>> Domain, Signal, Transit, Propeptide, Peptide, Topological domain,
>> Intramembrane, Transmenbrane for ranges of sequences, and Metal binding,
>> Active site, Modified residue, Lipidation, Glycosilation for point
>> positions.
>>
>> I appreciate any information on this matter.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Leyla García
>> EMBL-EBI, Cambridge, UK
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cmview-devel mailing list
>> cmview-devel at bioinformatics.org
>> http://www.bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/cmview-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cmview-devel mailing list
> cmview-devel at bioinformatics.org
> http://www.bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/cmview-devel
>