On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:34:56AM -0600, Geoff Hutchison wrote: > > > | This bug isn't a libgnome-dev bug, but only a problem when you build > > | this package with g++ 3.2 > > > > and that we should fix ghemical instead. > > Right. And did they give any sort of pointer as to how that should be > done? Is there some sort of C++ syntax problem with ghemical? Unfortunately, this paricular developer is quite well-known for just closing bugs without furher comments. I guess we are lucky he pointed out g++-3.2. :-/ Then again, that was not too hard, provided ghemical-1.00 built fine with g++-2.95. Did anybody else compile ghemical with g++-3.2? Michael