[ghemical-devel] OpenBabel-1.100.2 Release Candidate 2, testers wanted

[Jean Bréfort]

--=-l22TR5pyHr7m8ZsPsqAv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le mar 16/03/2004 =C3=A0 08:07, Tommi Hassinen a =C3=A9crit :
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Michael Banck wrote:
>=20
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 02:58:10PM +0200, Tommi Hassinen wrote:
> > > I made some updates into the v1.01+ version (branch MANY_PROJECTS_BRA=
NCH
> > > in CVS); it now takes libmopac7 and openbabel CFLAGS and LIBS from
> > > pkg-config (although no proper tests exist in configure yet).
> >
> > Just curious, will you release a 1.02 with these changes? And will ther=
e
> > be an initial mopac7-0.1 (or whatever it'll be called) release soon?
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> yes I think the v1.02 could be released once everything seems to work. An=
d
> mopac7-0.1 is at the same situation.
>=20
> > I'm currently trying to figure out how to get ghemical packaged up for
> > the next Debian release. I can still just hack the Makefile myself a bi=
t
> > and link dynamically to libopenbabel0 - I hope you don't mind?
>=20
> Ok, it's just good to test all this stuff.  :)
>=20
> Currently the compile/link settings are taken from pkg-config and I think
> that should be more or less ok. But what is still completely missing is
> the tests for existence of these various packages in the configure script=
.
> So if you add any of these tests, please send me a note so that I can
> duplucate them in other places where the tests are needed. Currently
>=20
> ghemical-1.01+	needs to test	mopac7, openbabel
>=20
> libghemical	needs to test	mopac7
> ghemical>1.01+	needs to test	mopac7, openbabel, libghemical
>=20
> Also the current build systems are quite similar in these different
> versions, which is helpful. So let's discuss about changes, and duplicate
> them as much as possible, so that we could keep it that way.

Why don't you use PKG_CHECK_MODULES? The configure.in would be simpler,
IMHO. Something as:

GTK_REQUIRED_VERSION=3D2.0.0
LIBGLADE_REQUIRED_VERSION=3D2.0.0
GTKGLEXT_REQUIRED_VERSION=3D1.0.0
MOPAC7_REQUIRED_VERSOION=3D1.00
LIBGHEMICAL_REQUIRED_VERSION=3D1.51
OPENBABEL_REQUIRED_VERSION=3D1.100.2

PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GHEMICAL,\
gtk+-2.0 >=3D $GTK_REQUIRED_VERSION \
libglade-2.0 >=3D LIBGLADEL_REQUIRED_VERSION \
gtkglext-1.0 >=3D $GTKGLEXT_REQUIRED_VERSION \
libmopac7 >=3D $MOPAC7_REQUIRED_VERSION \
libghemical >=3D LIBGHEMICAL_REQUIRED_VERSION \
openbabel >=3D $OPENBABEL_REQUIRED_VERSION)

AC_SUBST(GHEMICAL_CFLAGS)
AC_SUBST(GHEMICAL_LIBS)

With this GHEMICAL_CFLAGS and GHEMICAL_LIBS will contain all the
required flags. Note I mention here libglade-2.0. Use of libglade-config
ressults in the use of libglade-0.17 or earlier which is not a good
idea.

Regards,

Jean

--=-l22TR5pyHr7m8ZsPsqAv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAVt/BUkVLHK5zOkcRAsgrAKCjsLNLW7GBrFmh+y87Uhxq+7eXHACfaKPJ
k4k+RGcZUqf8hjeyopEVASQ=
=s0cU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-l22TR5pyHr7m8ZsPsqAv--