--=-AFjsd1F49BTp4zgIiUsL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le mer 19/05/2004 =C3=A0 11:59, Tommi Hassinen a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Geoff Hutchison wrote: >=20 > > One last question for Ghemical 1.5x development. Would it be helpful to > > build shared libraries for MOPAC and libghemical? I can help with this, > > though it's easiest to switch to automake/libtool when building shared > > libs and this makes the actual Makefiles unreadable. (OTOH, the > > Makefile.am files are easy to handle and the shared library support is > > worth it, IMHO.) >=20 > Hello, >=20 > unfortunately I know nothing about libtool or automake, and this is not a > good moment for me to start learning them either. :( >=20 > But. >=20 > An alternative build system like this seems to be quite easily > maintainable as a separate patch as well, or what do you think? Perhaps > this libtool/automake buildsystem could be a patchfile as long as it seem= s > to be tested and "safe" enough to be the principal build system. >=20 > Any ideas/comments? I fully agree with Geoff. Shared libraries are easier to use in many cases and libtool/automake make easy to build shared, static libraries or both. I can help too. Jean --=-AFjsd1F49BTp4zgIiUsL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAq0F1UkVLHK5zOkcRAorBAJ9zfQsICRM8kdb1Q4rbkke3MgmC+wCgh/UK t9l6oHESzPQI2fsgqlhW98A= =1bvG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-AFjsd1F49BTp4zgIiUsL--