I could probably mess with the configure script and try to give you a patch where make doesn't run pkg-config itself. If i get some time. Is there any chance you're going to do away with using gnome libraries and go strictly gtk2? I guess i don't know enough details about the toolkits to understand why you're using gnome. On Monday September 6 2004 05:49, Tommi Hassinen wrote: > On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Donald E. Curtis wrote: > > It is not a problem as i found i don't have gtkglext installed but it > > seems like this should be detected by the configure script. So i added > > this line: > > > > PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTKGLEXT, gtkglext-1.0 >= 1.0.5) > > Did this happen for the ghemical cvs "HEAD" version, right? That one is an > "alpha" version that I have not had time to look at for a loong time (it > is not discarded, I just don't have time to work on it now). But thanks > for the notice, I added the check. Also the Makefiles need to be fixed > (the src/Makefile will just call pkg-config directly which is just a quick > fix of mine to make it work). > > The more up-to-date version that I hope to make a stable version soon is > in "BEFORE_BONOBO_BRANCH" in cvs ; it uses libghemical just as the HEAD > version does, but it is still a gnome-1 application (the HEAD version is a > bonobo component). > > This is a figure about the current status of different branches ; > please just ask me if you have questions. > > /--> MANY_PROJECTS_BRANCH (v1.02) > / > ghemical ---------------------------> HEAD (v2.50 or whatever?) > \ > \------> BEFORE_BONOBO_BRANCH (v1.51) > > libghemical |----------> HEAD (v1.51) > > > Regards, > > Tommi > > _______________________________________________ > ghemical-devel mailing list > ghemical-devel@bioinformatics.org > http://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/ghemical-devel