[ghemical-devel] mopac7 package release candidate 2

[Tommi Hassinen]

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jean Bréfort wrote:

> The new tarballs works fine for me, both on 32 and 64 bits platforms. I
> tested libghemical from cvs which also combine fine. I have just a
> concern about mpqc I already have express some times ago if I remember
> well.

Hello, I also think the mopac 7 package is now in a quite good shape.

> I would like to know if it make sense to compile libghemical with
> --with-mpqc and ghemical with --without-mpqc or vice versa. If this does
> not make sense, the mpqc option should be removed from the ghemical
> configuration script and appropriate stuff should be added to
> libghemical.pc.in

Yes, this is true. Only libghemical truely depends on mpqc and it should
contain all dependencies that relate to this matter.

> Also, note that as default build of mpqc is only static, the same should
> apply IMHO to libghemical to avoid problems.

Thanks, I'll look at this. I haven't really tested the mpqc-related stuff
for the ghemical/libghemical release yet...

Regards,

	Tommi