Hello, I think you did not mention the version number. The latest development versions 1.91 of ghemical/lighemical should compile fine without either g2c.h or f2c.h (if you don't want to use the mopac7 features). Tommi On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Dr. Seth Olsen wrote: > Hi Ghemical developers, > > I've been struggling to build Ghemical on my pentium M laptop running FC4 > with gcc4.0.1. I finally succeeded in getting libghemical to compile (albeit > for the time being without mpqc support - although I have been directed to a > fix since then). However, when trying to build Ghemical, I am told that > -lg2c can't be found. I assume that the file I need is libg2c.a . However, I > am a bit confused about g2c. I understand from some web postings that g2c is > a gnu version of f2c, but the gnu site that I can find online states that > it's a 'glade to C' translator. I have always interpreted 'f2c' as 'fortran > to C'. I'm presently hung up on building a from-source version of g2c (can't > seem to find a binary) but this is failing miserably because it's not > linking well to my xml libraries (I think). > > Is there any way to build Ghemical without g2c? Is f2c adequate? Does anyone > know where a good i686 g2c binary can be located? > > Cheers, > > seth > > > ccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccms > > Dr Seth Olsen, PhD > Postdoctoral Fellow, Biomolecular Modeling Group > Centre for Computational Molecular Science > Chemistry Building, > The University of Queensland > Qld 4072, Brisbane, Australia > > tel (617) 33653732 > fax (617) 33654623 > email: s.olsen1 at uq.edu.au > Web: www.ccms.uq.edu.au <http://www.ccms.uq.edu.au> > > ccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccmsccms