On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: > On Aug 5, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Donald Ephraim Curtis wrote: > >> Is there anyone here who happens to have a license with Tripos that could >> call support and get the extended Tripos parameters. > > I don't think that's likely. If parameterization is published, then it's > public knowledge. But in the case of unpublished data, it's copyright by the > author (i.e., Tripos). I agree. > If you want a Tripos-like force field, I can think of two alternatives: > * Changing the Ghemical code to substitute elements in the same group and use > a different atomic radius / bond length. (Not great, but easy to do.) > * Reverse-engineering the parameters by evaluating the energy and geometry > optimization of a range of Si compounds using Tripos. > >> I have been contacted by a colleague who would like to get the Si and other >> force fields into ghemical but the paper where the original parameters came >> from doesn't include those fields. > > As we discussed on the list before, there are a range of other, more modern > force fields. UFF and MMFF94 come to mind. The latter even has a public test I have started the work on UFF, and I have now typed the parameter tables in ; soon I can start the actual coding. Let's see what I can do... Regards, Tommi