[ghemical-devel] licensing (was: Ghemical-2.95 is now released)

[thassine at messi.uku.fi]

First, I'm very VERY sorry that I have forgot to answer this ; during the last
months I have not been working but been at home taking care of our daughter.
But my intention is not to make excuses now, I simply want to say I'm sorry
about my mistake.

Then the second thing ; "GPL v2 and later" is OK to me, and I start changing the
files accordingly.

with best regards,

        Tommi


Quoting Michael Banck <mbanck at debian.org>:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 03:25:09PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > It turns out I had the copyright as "GPLv2 only" and he had it as "GPLv2
> and
> > later".  After looking at the license boilerplate of the source files,
> > either interpretation seems possible, but maybe "GPLv2 only" is more
> > likely:
> >
> > // This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > // under the terms of the license (GNU GPL) which comes with this package.
> >
> > Now that I think of it (and after checking that the same applies to
> > libghemical and ghemical), maybe I asked already in the past (sorry to
> > repeat the question then); maybe you could make that more clear by
> > including the full advised boilerplate at the top of the .cpp and .h
> > files:
> [...]
>
> Well, it would be nice to have a statement on this.  In the meanwhile, I
> won't wait any longer and upload liboglappth as GPLv2only to Debian now.
>
>
> Michael