any feature implementation should be able to read and write GFF. Its really simple, but quite powerful too.<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 March 2010 16:56, Jose M. Duarte <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jose.m.duarte@gmail.com">jose.m.duarte@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On 19 March 2010 14:55, Henning Stehr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stehr@molgen.mpg.de" target="_blank">stehr@molgen.mpg.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
That's alsways good. Bioperl and also Biojava make heavy use of<br>
features. But for the moment I'm quite happy with our<br>
lightweight feature implementation. For more fancy stuff like<br>
graphical representation of features we will maybe have to<br>
convert to Biojava features. Also have a look at DAS (<a href="http://biodas.org" target="_blank">biodas.org</a>) if<br>
you need inspiration.<br>
<br></blockquote></div><div><br><br>Just found this (by reading the biojava mailing list):<br><br><a href="http://www.sequenceontology.org/resources/gff3.html" target="_blank">http://www.sequenceontology.org/resources/gff3.html</a><br>
<br></div>
</div>Well using this kind of format is probably an over-kill for us. But still good to know that it exists.<br><font color="#888888"><br>Jose<br><br><br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Owl-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Owl-devel@bioinformatics.org">Owl-devel@bioinformatics.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/owl-devel" target="_blank">http://www.bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/owl-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>