> It is my understanding that while bonobo uses ORBit, it is just a library. > If I am correct, non-elegant bindings should be relatively easy. By > "non-elegant", I mean it the Python interface would feel more C-ish than > Python-ish. Ok, upon reviewing the documentation, I was way off before. However, one could still contain all of the ORBit code within the C stubs, and have only the Embeddable, Container, View, ViewFrame, ClientSite, etc object interfaces exposed in Python. So, ORBit bindings would not be necessary, and it would make components/containers pretty easy to write in Python. Anyone know if James Henstridge has started/implemented any of the bonobo stuff? Justin