[Pipet Devel] and still more infrastructure things

J.W. Bizzaro bizzaro at bc.edu
Mon Mar 1 19:01:45 EST 1999

Carlos Maltzahn wrote:
>     >     What really worried me was the thought of a _single_ Paos process
>     >     managing _everything_, including every read and write for every
>     >     single XML, just to get workflow information.  Agreed it would be
>     >     best to leave active workflow information to RAM.
>     >
>     > What is RAM?
>     :-) Random Access Memory, as in 64 MB RAM, system memory, not on disk.
> Huh? What has physical memory to do with this?

I mean workflow information is best left to being stored in a data structure,
which I'm assuming is kept in physical memory.  I guess I'm worng.  No big deal.

J.W. Bizzaro                  Phone: 617-552-3905
Boston College                mailto:bizzaro at bc.edu
Department of Chemistry       http://www.uml.edu/Dept/Chem/Bizzaro/

More information about the Pipet-Devel mailing list