Carlos Maltzahn wrote: > > > What really worried me was the thought of a _single_ Paos process > > managing _everything_, including every read and write for every > > single XML, just to get workflow information. Agreed it would be > > best to leave active workflow information to RAM. > > > > What is RAM? > > :-) Random Access Memory, as in 64 MB RAM, system memory, not on disk. > > Huh? What has physical memory to do with this? > I mean workflow information is best left to being stored in a data structure, which I'm assuming is kept in physical memory. I guess I'm worng. No big deal. Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro Phone: 617-552-3905 Boston College mailto:bizzaro at bc.edu Department of Chemistry http://www.uml.edu/Dept/Chem/Bizzaro/ --