"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote: > > Perhaps we can make BICML so that it does not *need* workflow data to be > complete, but that it can *handle* it. [cut] > So we have 4 options for the workflow data: > > (1) Put it in BICML, mixed with the biodata > (2) Put it in BICML, separate from the biodata > (3) Put it in a separate XML > (4) Leave it as pure objects in PAOS > I want to stress that in all cases we should make an XML that can include workflow data, but is complete without it, having only bio data. So with option 1, where the XML has workflow and bio data mixed, can the workflow data be left out by someone who wants to use it as a purely biological ML? If we can do this, and include an XML parser with PAOS, I'll be happy. Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro Phone: 617-552-3905 Boston College mailto:bizzaro at bc.edu Department of Chemistry http://www.uml.edu/Dept/Chem/Bizzaro/ --