hinsen at dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr wrote: > Since I had already started with DocBook and didn't want to start > again from scratch with something else, I ended up using the XML > version of DocBook with modifications (added in the internal DTD > subset) for documenting Python code, and I wrote my own translators to > HTML and LaTeX in Python using DOM. But if I had to do it again, I'd > design my own specialized DTD. Konrad, Thanks for your input on the limitations of DocBook. Being rather new to DocBook, I wasn't aware of these limitations that you pointed out. I understand that DocBook is customizable (although its not DocBook any more once you customize it). What do you recommend? Is there a better alternative to DocBook, or could we just customize it to meet our needs? --gary =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Gary Van Domselaar gvd at redpoll.pharmacy.ualberta.ca Faculty of Pharmacy Phone: (780) 492-4493 University of Alberta FAX: (780) 492-5305 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada http://redpoll.pharmacy.ualberta.ca/~gvd