Gary Van Domselaar wrote: > > ORBithon sounds cooler than pyorbit, but sounds more like a dance-music > marathon than python-orbit bindings. Exactly. Or the name of a theater that would hold dance performances :-) > I believe LGPL now stands for the GNU Lesser Public License. From > http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html > > <snip> > [This is the first released version of the Lesser GPL. It also counts > as the successor of the GNU Library Public License, version 2, hence > the version number 2.1.] > </snip> That's right. The name change is for 2 reasons: (1) Richard Stallman wants developers to migrate from the LGPL to the regular GPL, and so the word 'lesser' is used in a derogatory way to discourage use (I'm serious; I did some reading about this). The license even has a clause to allow license change ONLY TO THE GPL. (2) "It's not just for libraries anymore." The LGPL serves an attractive purpose for many developers: Binary-only software can link to LGPL-licensed software by the terms of the LGPL. This is not the case with the GPL. But Stallman would rather not encourage binary-only software in any way, and so he is backstepping on the LGPL. However, if commercial acceptance is important (as with large libraries like GTK+ and GNOME, which are LGPL'd), then so is the availability of the 'lesser' version of the GPL. Otherwise, IMO, developers might go with a BSD-type license for libraries. Loci is LGPL'd. Cheers. Jeff -- +----------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | jeff at bioinformatics.org | | | | THE OPEN LAB | | Open Source Bioinformatics | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------+