jarl van katwijk wrote: > > Thinking the PL (overflow) hold all structures that come out the UI\DL. The BL > holds a subset of this information needed for real life operation, like inet > locations and encryption keys. The BL will define this information by applying > static logic. I'm a bit confused about how and why PL (Overflow) would hold the structure of a distributed network of Overflow instances. Overflow should hold its own network structures, and the structures of Overflow instances should be held...in the BL or DL? No? > I though this DL's sharing it's nodes with another DL is something that Loci would > have gotten? I think there is some similarity between your idea for DL-sharing and Loci's plan for the UI's/DL's to 'share a session'. Brad, you are familiar with both ideas. Could we be talking about the same thing here? Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+