[Pipet Devel] Re: thoughts on UI->DL communication
jarl van katwijk
jarl at casema.net
Tue Apr 11 14:40:19 EDT 2000
"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote:
> I also think the BL needs to handle the management of permanent network/volume
> storage.
No problem. I think I hardly need to change anything about the storage, only need
to
realize the retreival code.
GMS currently stores all data that passed its net to disk. (or gms naming:
'historyIO')
This is kinda rough, but in principal it's what you need.
>
>
> The DL/UI will handle the temporary loading of networks/volumes into a
> workspace.
Yep, by doing so reducing processing load.
>
>
> UI UI
> | |
> \ | / \ | /
> rootDL DL
> | |
> \ | / \ | /
> BL
>
>
> As per Jarl's suggestion. So, there really is only DL->DL authentication,
> correct?
No, arf, this is my suggestion:
1) 2) 3)
UI UI UI
| | |
\ | / \ | / \ | /
rootDL DL <--- DL
| |
\ | / \ | /
BROKERING LAYER
1- rootDL log AUTOMATICALLY into the BL,
2- this rootDL can grant other DL's access to the BL,
3- every DL can deside to grant other DL access to ITS OWN nodes.
(but maybe the rootDL shouldn't be able to do (3)? )
Clear?
bye,
jarl
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list