Jeff wrote: [described ISYS and OpenBSA/ALBeanBox -- two application with similar goals to Piper] > I asked the authors of both applications if we can all work on a common API > for wrapping applications. This would allow a client wrapped for one system > to work in another system. They said yes, but considering that ISYS does not > use XML and OpenBSA already uses Applab, I don't know if we could reach > a consensus. Can I get the opinions of people on this list before I consider > contacting them again? Peter wrote: > For the record, I'm for a standard, if only one shared between OpenBSA > and Piper (and dare I hope, NetGenics' BSA-compliant product...). I'd like to add my enthusiastic support to the idea of trying to collaborate with OpenBSA/ALBeanBox and the ISYS projects. I think we all have the same goal in mind (ie. an easy to use tool that can connect stuff together) and we will get there a lot faster and with better success if we can work together. So far our collaborations with Overflow and GMS have been really excellent, and I'd really be for seeing this type of thing continue. So when you contact them Jeff, can you keep us informed of what happens? I don't know if either the projects has active public mailing lists, but I think here would be a good place to discuss colloborating, if they are into it. Thanks for thinking about putting this together! Brad