Gary Van Domselaar wrote: > > Well now this is an interesting concept. If I catch your drift, you are > proposing that we use a web server to process the xml, and then > dyanamically generate the web page and send that to the browser. I believe Brad and I are thinking about the same thing here: Loci Web front == Web server-side persistent CGI It's a little confusing, because we're saying that Loci's front-end is a Web back-end. > Considering my distate for the development tools available to access the > DOM from the web client, I could go for that. It does seem a _little_ > odd that we use xml to communicate between the client (gtk, web > _server_, and nli) if we go by this method. So... I most definitely would NOT pass Loci's XML to a Web browser. > So do you then propose to pass xml through corba, or to just drop xml > for client/middleware communication? If we go corba, i really don't see > the point of using xml. This is our old delema: We want to use modern tools like XML and CORBA, but there is no _need_ to use XML if we're using CORBA. Cheers. Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+