> So in order to do this, we would need to have the Overflow C++ > files in the piper module. So, I was wondering about how people felt > about putting Overflow and also GMS into Piper as bl and pl > directories, respectively. I've talked with Jarl about this a bit and > I think he might almost be ready to do this. From Overflow, I would > just like to put in the 'data-flow' directory for now, since this will > give us the "basic" nodes for doing things. Putting things into Piper > will also bring us closer to integration, which I also like :-). > So, what does everything think about this? Objections? Thoughts? > Comments? Are there better ways to move forward? > Thanks for listening! I have no problem with intergrating GMS into the piper cvs, but 1st a few TODO's need to be finished: 1- debugging of previous work 2- removal of gnome dependancies in the dataflow processor ( 3- some 'primitive' linking with overflow 1 & 2 are mostly done, and when they are finished I'll start working on 3. After this I'll take action to have GMS put into cvs. bye, jarl