"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote: > > But, Jarl will argue that GMS can do more than just talk to Overflow. Do we > NEED the BL to talk to a node other than Overflow??? ........other than Overflow and a remote instance of another BL. Let's think about how a "document" or "database" is implemented in Piper. Can/should these be implemented by Overflow? If they are implemented by GMS, is there a duplication of functionality that would lead to confusion for the user? Actually, I vote for option A in the first e-mail. I think it would be simplest for us and for the user. Cheers. Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+