[Pipet Devel] hierarchy (was: icons)
J.W. Bizzaro
bizzaro at geoserve.net
Tue Jun 20 10:36:50 EDT 2000
"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote:
>
> But, Jarl will argue that GMS can do more than just talk to Overflow. Do we
> NEED the BL to talk to a node other than Overflow???
........other than Overflow and a remote instance of another BL.
Let's think about how a "document" or "database" is implemented in Piper.
Can/should these be implemented by Overflow? If they are implemented by GMS,
is there a duplication of functionality that would lead to confusion for the
user?
Actually, I vote for option A in the first e-mail. I think it would be
simplest for us and for the user.
Cheers.
Jeff
--
+----------------------------------+
| J.W. Bizzaro |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
| |
| BIOINFORMATICS.ORG |
| The Open Lab |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/ |
+----------------------------------+
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list