> This is what I meant. I'm aware that there are 100's of actual nodes and many > more to come. What I meant by "types" is "categories", classes, etc. 15 or > so may be doable. Then we agree. We should still have the ability to override category icons for nodes that have an icon... Or simply specify an icon for every nodes, though many can point to the same icon. I prefer the secondoption. > > > Also, when building a > > subnet, we should have the option to assign an icon to it. > > Right. Since a subnet can be made to do anything, subnet icons should be > changable. Actually, the user shouldn't even be able to tell the difference between a subnet and a builtin node. > > > I'd like the whole thing to look a bit like Simulink. > > I'm not sure I've heard of Simulink. Do you have a URL? It's a Matlab toolbox that uses connected blocks to simulate systems http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/ -- Jean-Marc Valin Universite de Sherbrooke - Genie Electrique valj01 at gel.usherb.ca