"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote: > > Perhaps we should take a look at direct BL -> BL communication (keep execution > in the RTS). From what Jarl has said, it seems the BL is very capable of > doing that. You know we already trimmed a lot of functionality out of the BL. If the BL is only supposed to communicate with the PL and the DL (sit right in the middle), and it doesn't need to tell the PL how to execute its network (the PL has its own approach), what's the purpose of the BL??? Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+