Jarl van Katwijk wrote: > > Ic, gms is still very simple about connectivity logic, is this area loci is much more > mature. It's not that we have all this programmed. If we did, we'd be nearly done. It's just that we've been talking about this stuff for more than a year now :-) > Good Thing, I like using standards anyway, and XML seems to be a good candidate for > data-encapsulation. That's good to hear, since Loci and Overflow have invested heavily in XML. > the 2nd, coding the core on my own wont go quickly enough. I wouldn't say that we're expecting you to code the core on your own ;-) > You're correct. As long as corba is used to combine all parts it's better to chose a > language for every part. Pythons can be better for the GUI, C is best for the core and > C++ can be used for a 'detail level'. I don't know what the core will look like in the end. It seems all 3 projects have something to contribute to it. But it only makes sense to have the core in one language. Cheers. Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+