[Pipet Devel] Re: [Fwd: [Pipet Devel] Re: Overflow/Loci/GMS collaboration]

[J.W. Bizzaro]

jarl van katwijk wrote:
> 
> hehe, just a little bit :)  But mostly I'm defending my idears..
> Also when the Overflow project aint going to collaborate, I'll still watch them
> very regulairly and I surtainly will think a lot more about how to do wrapping of
> sub nets of overflow-type nodes inside a gms\loci node. Because it add new
> features without breaking the security \ locationing \ etc.

I don't believe Jean-Marc wants to bulldoze your code and ideas.  I think he
just saw Overflow has possibly being able to handle the role of application
integrator.  Again, we should consider GMS and Overflow as separate
applications, but applications that share a lot of technology.  You even
admitted that there are some Overflow features that you like and would want to
have for GMS.

Is there anything wrong with the idea that Overflow and GMS can run together
yet be perfectly usable without each other?

Cheers.
Jeff
-- 
                      +----------------------------------+
                      |           J.W. Bizzaro           |
                      |                                  |
                      | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
                      |                                  |
                      |        BIOINFORMATICS.ORG        |
                      |           The Open Lab           |
                      |                                  |
                      |    http://bioinformatics.org/    |
                      +----------------------------------+