[Pipet Devel] node-to-node communication: you can have it 3 ways!
J.W. Bizzaro
bizzaro at geoserve.net
Sat Mar 18 10:03:52 EST 2000
"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote:
> +--------+ +--------+
> (HOST B) | GMS |_______\| GMS | (HOST C)
> +--------+ /+--------+
GMS's
PROTOCOL
[cut]
> +----------+/___/ \____+----------+
> | |\ | |
> | Overflow | | Overflow |
> | |___________________________________\| |
> +----------+ OVERFLOW'S PROTOCOL /+----------+
Under what circumstances should 'VSH' switch between using Overflow's protocol
and GMS's? Well, if we decide that GMS and Overflow will use DIFFERENT
protocols to communicate between themselves (i.e., Overflow-to-Overflow and
GMS-to-GMS), we can find these circumstances.
Perhaps Overflow can use a protocol better for small objects: like CORBA. And
GMS could use a protocol better for moving large files: straight TCP/IP.
Hmmmm. Me like. How about you?
Cheers.
Jeff
--
+----------------------------------+
| J.W. Bizzaro |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
| |
| BIOINFORMATICS.ORG |
| The Open Lab |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/ |
+----------------------------------+
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list