[Pipet Devel] node-to-node communication: you can have it 3 ways!

J.W. Bizzaro bizzaro at geoserve.net
Sat Mar 18 10:03:52 EST 2000


"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote:

>                   +--------+        +--------+
>         (HOST B)  |  GMS   |_______\|  GMS   |  (HOST C)
>                   +--------+       /+--------+
                               GMS's
                              PROTOCOL
[cut]
>   +----------+/___/                          \____+----------+
>   |          |\                                   |          |
>   | Overflow |                                    | Overflow |
>   |          |___________________________________\|          |
>   +----------+        OVERFLOW'S PROTOCOL        /+----------+

Under what circumstances should 'VSH' switch between using Overflow's protocol
and GMS's?  Well, if we decide that GMS and Overflow will use DIFFERENT
protocols to communicate between themselves (i.e., Overflow-to-Overflow and
GMS-to-GMS), we can find these circumstances.

Perhaps Overflow can use a protocol better for small objects: like CORBA.  And
GMS could use a protocol better for moving large files: straight TCP/IP.

Hmmmm.  Me like.  How about you?

Cheers.
Jeff
-- 
                      +----------------------------------+
                      |           J.W. Bizzaro           |
                      |                                  |
                      | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
                      |                                  |
                      |        BIOINFORMATICS.ORG        |
                      |           The Open Lab           |
                      |                                  |
                      |    http://bioinformatics.org/    |
                      +----------------------------------+




More information about the Pipet-Devel mailing list