"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote: > +--------+ +--------+ > (HOST B) | GMS |_______\| GMS | (HOST C) > +--------+ /+--------+ GMS's PROTOCOL [cut] > +----------+/___/ \____+----------+ > | |\ | | > | Overflow | | Overflow | > | |___________________________________\| | > +----------+ OVERFLOW'S PROTOCOL /+----------+ Under what circumstances should 'VSH' switch between using Overflow's protocol and GMS's? Well, if we decide that GMS and Overflow will use DIFFERENT protocols to communicate between themselves (i.e., Overflow-to-Overflow and GMS-to-GMS), we can find these circumstances. Perhaps Overflow can use a protocol better for small objects: like CORBA. And GMS could use a protocol better for moving large files: straight TCP/IP. Hmmmm. Me like. How about you? Cheers. Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+